Reply With Quote
Because your issue is that this ban gave terrorism "marketing material" and leads to more danger. That is the definition of walking on egg s s. Not doing something for fear of what you might make terrorist do/feel.
No, where did you get that?
And anyway, how does "not placing a blanket ban on travelers from 7 countries" qualify as "walking on eggs s?"
Because your issue is that this ban gave terrorism "marketing material" and leads to more danger. That is the definition of walking on egg s s. Not doing something for fear of what you might make terrorist do/feel.
Yo I came acrossed this while youtubing. Check it out.
This got Trump is about to start affecting my life directly now.
"When I was a child I played with childish things. When I became a man I put childish things away." Grow the up, Reck.
Better intel on the recruitment of people who eventually become terrorists. Better control over how those people are able to obtain the weapons enabling them to commit acts of terror.
And I think unfortunately we have to start by setting the expectation that we may not be able to prevent a single act of terrorism from ever happening again.
They liberals think making something illegal solves the problem.
Maybe we should just pass a law banning terrorism in the USA?
They forget about existing laws, and like to make more of the same...
Old man, games are a hobby of mine.
Much like ing around an online board is yours. I dont see a difference between the two.
In fact, there are studies that say gaming makes you..smarter or something like that.
"Walking on eggs s" implies being extra careful not to offend. I don't think NOT banning nationals from these countries is being extra careful. It's normal.
And anyway, that's not my only issue with this ban.
November 15, 2015: comments made by Hillary Clinton in a New Hampshire Town Hall
“I voted numerous times when I was a senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in,” Clinton said “and I do think that you have to control your borders.”
These people have visas already approved, thus that privilege already granted. The proper procedure would be to revoke those visas. As somebody already pointed out, and courts have already established when Barry tried to pull the same stunt through executive order, it's not a matter of policy, but a matter of law.
These people already have permission to be here, have already been vetted.
What we're doing to this class of people is illegal besides being shameful, immoral and outrageous.
This deserves to get slapped down by the courts with a quickness: https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/f..._complaint.pdf
This ban also applies to legal immigrants. That's the key issue. For tourists, refugees, illegals, etc, it's arguably not that big of a deal.
Green card holders can be married to American citizens and have fully legal families here. Obtaining such a visa (which is the permanent residency) is extremely difficult (I speak from experience).
We'll see how this develops, but at least as far as permanent residents goes, I don't think this is going to fly. Although, a court order might take more than 90 days, and nobody knows what happens after that.
The 20% hike on produce wouldn't affect your life directly?
lol re ed question
US border patrol is checking people’s Facebook for political views
Border agents are searching refugee’s Facebook accounts to ascertain their religious and political beliefs, according to Mana Yegani of the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
Ms. Yegani told The Intercept that some of those she has consulted – despite having valid visas – have been interrogated by border agents about their political beliefs before being allowed into the country.
“These are people that are coming in legally. They have jobs here and they have vehicles here,” she said. “Just because Trump signed something at 6pm yesterday, things are coming to a crashing halt. It’s scary.”
Trita Parsi, head of the Iranian-American Council, also reported that green card holders are being subjected to political interrogations.
http://usuncut.com/news/us-border-patrol-checking-peoples-facebook-political-views/
Be more specific. What are you referring to?
Lol. I hope Parker somehow gets caught up in the net.
Paul Ryan Gets Added to Wikipedia Page on Spineless Animals (Invertebrates)
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/01/...iticus+USA+%29
Avocados for a starter.
Vegetables that come from Mexico in the winter. You eat, right?
Admittedly I'm more of a carnivore so I could live without it if I must but I would rather not.
A (very short) list of Republicans in Congress who have criticized Trump’s immigration order
http://www.vox.com/2017/1/28/1442719...-refugee-order
Apparently, Trash consulted no lawyers.
A NY Judge has also ruled it out.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
