Money is irrelevant. It's about on court play. And Mills will be making money soon enough.
The whole Spurs starting lineup has a positive RPM except porker. How the does that happen? tbh..?
Like the Spurs are so good and win on average and porker has a negative RPM still.![]()
Money is irrelevant. It's about on court play. And Mills will be making money soon enough.
Who gives a if Paddy is more SG than PG. That doesn't automatically make Enrique a better option. Joel Anthony is more of a traditional big man than Bertans too but I'd much rather have Davis out there.
On court play shows that Mills is an above average PG backup while Parker is the worst starting PG in the league.
It does matter that TP is easily the best PG when it comes to solutions. Patty is getting his chance and he's failing miserably at being PG. So now there are no solution. Couple that with the fact Patty said he wants a shot at being a starting PG and he's due a big pay day? Yah, it's an issue.
It does not make TP automatically better but the fact is that is the truth. It's not because Patty is more of a SG - it's because Patty lacks PG skills to be a competent starter at PG.
That is true. It's also true that money aside (because you don't win les based on contract sizes but actual on court performance) that TP is better than Mills at PG and that is the issue.
I'd love to see Murray start an Parker comes off the bench... But with everyone wanting Mills gone but bring back George Hill, Murray would definitely still be the 3rd man out! Summer league will really help Murray alot.
Exactly. In general, despite the fact that most of us think hes capable of more, Paddy has done his job (back-up PG) well enough. It's hilarious that Porkerstans are trying to on him because he isnt also doing Porker's job.
[QUOTE=FkLA;8924325]Exactly. In general, despite the fact that most of us think hes capable of more, Paddy has done his job (back-up PG) well enough. It's hilarious that Porkerstans are trying to on him because he isnt also doing Porker's job.[/QUOTE]
![]()
People are ting on Mills because people here think he's a better starting PG than TP and he's not. As bad as TP is, Mills is worse. Thats what you don't get and that is what you fail to realize when analyzing the current situation.
Almost like he closes out games better.![]()
Thank you.
Where was that truth these past two games when Pop went with Paddy in the 4th and OT? If Enrique truly was the clear cut better option like you're trying to make it sound that wouldn't be happening during such a crucial stretch of the season.
It's happened regularly throughout the season too.
if tony's so important then why is the spurs winning % ten points higher when tony doesn't play?
He is getting Paid 17 mil for what a rookie can do.![]()
We've already seen Mills numbers with the same starters as TP and they are worse than TP's.
I don't see how it's debatable when Tony's only compe ion is Ginobili and Murray. While I agree that Parker's contract is hindering, it's not his fault, it's the PATFO's fault for giving him that extension. I'm not sure why people are blaming Parker for being old. Maybe if he came off the bench for his entire career, he'd have a lot more to give.
Spurs are 7-1 when Manure doesn't play, tbh. Hope that $14,000,000 cancer tears an achilles
True. Not everyone can face backup scrubs like Manure has had the privilege of doing
Yeah, he sure does. 1-9 FG, 1-6- 3-Pt FG, 0 assists, 5 personal fouls in 32 minutes.![]()
And Pop still thought he was the better player.![]()
http://stats.nba.com/lineups/traditi...EVIATION&dir=1
With both starting lineups we've seen: Danny/Kawhi/LMA/Pau & Danny/Kawhi/LMA/Dedmon
With TP: +2.7 & +2.4
With PM: +1.2 & n/a
In 3-man units with the two best players (kawhi/lma) so likely most important minutes vs other teams best players:
With TP: +3.6
With PM: +2.3
Biggest backpedal in Spurstalk history from "Mills is the future of the Spurs at the PG position."
Pretending like you never uttered that kind of stupidity.
Hedging harder than a pick and roll.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)