Sign and trade LMA for Milsap

[tholdren]

Mcdyess

Bonner

[tmtcsc]

I've been following the Spurs for close to 25 years. I think it is you who hasn't been following the Spurs. They let Avery Johnson go, they were willing to let David Robinson walk, they tried trading Brent Barry more than once, they traded Bruce Bowen. i don't see why they wouldn't trade TP if there opportunity was there.

Parker currently has a serious injury, he might not even play this season, so if they can salary dump his contract with a pick to open up more cap space, there is no reason not to do it. He's not a Spurs legend on the level of Tim Duncan, D-Rob or even Manu. The Spurs probably would have let Manu walk last off-season if they weren't in position to pay anywhere near what Philadelphia was offering.

Exactly. I've been saying the same thing for forever. Anyone who thinks the F.O. wouldn't trade Parker to improve the team doesn't know what they're talking about. End of story. Kony calling TP a "An all time great" or "Legend" is a laughable and sad at the same time. Parker has ridden the coattails of all-time greats like Robinson, Duncan and Manu. He's been a good player and we can leave it at that. Just because he's been on the team since he was a teenager doesn't make him a legend, it makes him old and stale now. Otherwise, he's been a pain in the ass with the organization by sabotaging a potential Jason Kidd signing and ing around with Brent Barry's wife. Dude's at it again now by talking about having another contract to fulfill a 20 year career goal. That 's as delusional as Kony and Dverde thinking the Spurs won't move him.

I keep asking for someone to give me an example of when the Spurs have kept a player rostered out of loyalty. When? Who?

[tonight...you]

Mcdyess

Looked into Kennard. You're right. That dude is a player.

[Joseph Kony]

They literally swallowed Tim Duncan's salary for 3 years instead of trading him to be waived, the you talking about

TP has 4 rings, a FMVP, multiple all-star and All-NBA appearances with the Spurs and has been here for almost two decades. You can keep spewing off whatever bull you want but the fact of the matter is spurs won't trade TP and no team will trade for him. I'll ban myself from posting if the spurs trade TP in a salary dump.

Did TP your wife too or what? We can all agree he's been trash for a few years now but that doesn't negate the history. Pop refusing to bench him should be proof enough for you. But please tell me how stretching Duncan's contract instead of salary dumping him is somehow different and not being loyal

[tmtcsc]

Mcdyess

Get the out of here. Same with Bonner. Those two dudes weren't here because of loyalty. Bonner was a bench player who got paid the minimum in his last contract. er never even got a courtesy call to say the Spurs weren't going to re-sign him. McDyess was here for 3 years and made 15 million dollars. He was 34 years old. He played out his contract and retired. That's some weak ass you're throwing out. Makes my point even more.

[tmtcsc]

They literally swallowed Tim Duncan's salary for 3 years instead of trading him to be waived, the you talking about

TP has 4 rings, a FMVP, multiple all-star and All-NBA appearances with the Spurs and has been here for almost two decades. You can keep spewing off whatever bull you want but the fact of the matter is spurs won't trade TP and no team will trade for him. I'll ban myself from posting if the spurs trade TP in a salary dump.

Did TP your wife too or what? We can all agree he's been trash for a few years now but that doesn't negate the history. Pop refusing to bench him should be proof enough for you. But please tell me how stretching Duncan's contract instead of salary dumping him is somehow different and not being loyal

This is what I'm talking about: : http://www.sportingnews.com/nba/news...31lzw445yshvj9


You really need to brush up on your homework and stop comparing Tim Duncan with Tony Parker. For your own credibility's sake. Tim signed a 2 year 10.4 Million dollar contract coming off a season where he was an All-Star. That was 5.1 Million dollars per season. Never mind what he meant to the franchise in terms of leadership, history and the locker room. He made a HUGE sacrifice to ensure the team could sign other players, free-agents etc. And you're trying to compare him to TP's current situation? I think TP's skipping your wife and ing you, tbh.

[Joseph Kony]

lol i figured you'd move the goalpost and try to rationalize the fact that your question about choosing loyalty never happened which you obviously are wrong about.

Only you a small number of posters really believe the spurs would salary dump TP. and i dont think you realize this but PATFO don't give a about your re ed opinion on Tony, they obviously love him, and they will never trade him. so it doesnt matter what re ed ass mental gymnastics you do or what stupid reasoning you come up with. The Spurs will NOT dump Tony Parker. So by all means continue postulating stupid trade scenarios that won't happen and wasting your time, but it aint gonna happen, and the fact the spurs are looking to trade Green instead is even more proof

[tmtcsc]

lol i figured you'd move the goalpost and try to rationalize the fact that your question about choosing loyalty never happened which you obviously are wrong about.

First, can someone translate what this is supposed to mean? Secondly, why don't you just admit you the bed with your earlier post and really don't know what the you're talking about. The Spurs swallowed Tim's 3 year contract instead of trading him to another team and having him waived? He had 1 year left AND they waived him for cap purposes. Do you ing read or have a memory better than a fish?

Only you a small number of posters really believe the spurs would salary dump TP. and i dont think you realize this but PATFO don't give a about your re ed opinion on Tony, they obviously love him, and they will never trade him. so it doesnt matter what re ed ass mental gymnastics you do or what stupid reasoning you come up with. The Spurs will NOT dump Tony Parker. So by all means continue postulating stupid trade scenarios that won't happen and wasting your time, but it aint gonna happen, and the fact the spurs are looking to trade Green instead is even more proof :lmao

Wait! Wha wha what? The Spurs are shopping Danny Green? But he has a Championship ring and is one of our best defenders. They wouldn't do that!!! Not the loyal Spurs! He even gave them a discount on his last contract. They wouldn't do that!



Let me educate you for a moment. Danny Green is a very good defender but a 1 trick pony on offense. He is a tradeable asset because he has two years left on his contract and he can decline the final year if he so chooses. Teams in rebuild mode (Brooklyn for example) take on ty contracts all the time because.........along with a salary cap, there is a salary min. Therefore, if a team is in rebuilding mode, they will take on ty salaries / contracts (like Tony Parker's or Mosgov) to help satisfy their minimum salary requirements. That's why they also will want young, cheap talent (DeAngelo Russell) in return. TP is perfect to trade because he is in the final year of his deal and would allow a team all sorts of flexibility in 2018.


Quit spewing bull about things you know nothing about and aren't based in reality. Wrong facts, no siting of previous situations where the Spurs were loyal to a player and treated him with Kid Gloves. You ought to ban yourself now regardless of whether Parker gets salary dumped or not. Your takes suck-ass and are ing childish.

[tonight...you]

First, can someone translate what this is supposed to mean? Secondly, why don't you just admit you the bed with your earlier post and really don't know what the you're talking about. The Spurs swallowed Tim's 3 year contract instead of trading him to another team and having him waived?



Wait! Wha wha what? The Spurs are shopping Danny Green? But he has a Championship ring and is one of our best defenders. They wouldn't do that!!! Not the loyal Spurs! He even gave them a discount on his last contract. They wouldn't do that!



Quit spewing bull about things you know nothing about and aren't based in reality. Wrong facts, no siting of previous situations where the Spurs were loyal to a player and treated him with Kid Gloves. You ought to stop posting now regardless of whether Parker gets salary dumped or not. You have takes.

Your avi gives you permanent immunity from anything that I may disagree with you. I am left helpless, under it's gaze.

[Leetonidas]

Lol keep waiting for that TP trade. Only a re would believe spurs would trade him. Also rofl comparing Green to Parker. lmao

[Leetonidas]

If TP is so perfect to trade why are the Spurs looking to trade Green instead of Parker tbh?

Just hilarious people are wasting their time discussing trade scenarios for TP that will never happen

[cd98]

Hard to trade TP because he's under contract, but can't play due to injury. Green and LMA get you a player.

[cutewizard]

Its trading timeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[SAGirl]

Hard to trade TP because he's under contract, but can't play due to injury. Green and LMA get you a player.

I thought the same. Turns out the injury really stinks. I still think obviously they like him etc. Spurs legend etc, prefer not to trade him etc.. But from the financial aspect, Spurs seem to want to make moves right now to get pick maybe for the player at the spot or to aspire to get Porzinguis ... trading Tony requires sending assets out that don't help in that quest at all.