60 games? Are you kidding me? The Spurs have only won 60 games or better twice in the entire history of the franchise (94-95, 02-03). The Mavs have only done it once (02-03). And that Mavs team was absolutely stacked. Nowitzki, Finley, and Nash averaged 25.1, 19.3, and 17.7 points per game respectively. I can see Nowitzki putting up comparable (or better) numbers, but who's going to score like Finley and Nash? Who's going to come in off the bench and hit big shots like Van Exel? Who's going to construct a high-powered offensive attack like Don Nelson?
Hey, I love the Mavs, but 60 wins is a pretty big milestone for a team, and it took the Mavs the best group it's ever had to achieve that. You can't make a compelling argument that this year's Mavs are better than 02-03 (or maybe you can...I'd like to hear it). Depth only takes you so far. Those JailBlazers teams of the early naughts were as deep as the Pacific and couldn't even approach 60 wins. And they actually had talent that had been tested and found to be good. Dallas has a lot of potentional, but they can't win 60. Not in the West. Not with only one star. No way.![]()

Reply With Quote
Enjoy the moment.
