Reply With Quote
McCain is a very unsavory character as you noted pre-2009. Your insistence on classifying him as a traitor or not is an attempt to have a laborious debate.
Regardless of your high opinion of McCain, you wouldn't have made your re ed point if you had grasped the context of the argument.
McCain is a very unsavory character as you noted pre-2009. Your insistence on classifying him as a traitor or not is an attempt to have a laborious debate.
It's only laborious because you refuse to answer a simple yes or no question.
Do you actually consider McCain a traitor to the US?
Yes or no.
Yea, you're butt posting cos you think it's a rather innocuous question.
I didn't say it was a rather innocuous question. I said it was a simple yes or no question.
Do you actually consider McCain a traitor to the US?
Yes or no.
I would say it to his face
I said he needed to vote for trump on his voice mail also
You didn't say it; you just tried to play it off as if it was akin to one.
No, Hater's point was made in the greater context of slandering McCain. You can't see the forest for the trees if you don't realize that.
And where did I say I have a high opinion of McCain? I respect his service but I don't agree with his politics or think he's been all that great in congress. But I certainly don't think he is a traitor.
I said it was a simple yes or no question.
Do you actually consider McCain a traitor to the US?
Yes or no.
I think McCain is a coward like you. I wouldn't hastily make a determination about whether or not he is a traitor.
Why do you think he's a coward?How long would it take you to make such a determination?I wouldn't hastily make a determination about whether or not he is a traitor.
... but he would when making a determination about whether or not he's a coward.
This won't be a laborious debate
BTW, you've essentially called him a coward, too. But a coward's bar for coward is flexible.
You do realize there's a significant difference between being a coward and a traitor?... but he would when making a determination about whether or not he's a coward.
There is no debate. It's only laborious because you are dodging every question asked of you.
BTW, you've essentially called him a coward, too. But a coward's bar for coward is flexible.
Why do you think he's a coward?
How long would it take you to make such a determination?
Ok, now I'm somewhat curious to hear why he's a coward and why it apparently takes much more time to make a determination about whether he's a traitor.
Is it cowardly to allow the livelihoods of millions of Americans to go by the wayside?
Yes or no.
Doesn't look like an adjective that would apply either way tbh. It's a stupid stalling tactic by you because you are afraid to say what you actually think. That's cowardice.
You've dodged three directions in a row. You need to catch up.
Why do you think he's a coward?
Do you actually consider McCain a traitor to the US?
Remember when you complained about Obamas golfing lol now you suck Trumps and he golfs 20x as much
It's simply not applicable since there is zero context. Feel free to try to give it context -- you won't.
Because you are a coward.
You've dodged three directions in a row. You need to catch up.
Why do you think he's a coward?
Do you actually consider McCain a traitor to the US?
Thats not relevant to our exchange.
I said same thing can be said about Hitler esponding to this your statement:
Nothing in my reply is infactual or incorrect.
You could have said “Mcain had 2 arms”
And I could have said “same thing can be said about hitler”
And your dumnb ass would have said “but you missed the point where he killed 6 million jews”
You are sounding re ed and you are confusing the out of DMX so just stop
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions