Reply With Quote
Recognition of a growing cancer is the reason I posted this.
In this thread. What are you calling for?
Recognition of a growing cancer is the reason I posted this.
But do nothing.
A real man of action you are.
Either that or wallowing in victimhood like a whiny little per/par
This is a culture problem. I merely want more people to recognize the issue and that it's toxic to our country. The solution for damn sure isn't suggesting that people just post their content on YouTube.
Other than that the only thing to do is for colleges and police to actually punish people when they break rules or laws.
But what is your idea of free speech on campus?
Who ing cares. No one here is going to Berkeley.
Actually, YouTube is as free speech as it gets, plus you get the snowflake safe space (you could even turn off comments)... There's no guarantees on the first amendment as to the venue(s) where you might exercise your right. There's also absolutely no reason why some other people that disagree can't exercise their right to free speech to protest your opinion. And rightly so, tbh
Their free speech regularly involves invading the venue and causing disruptions to the event. It involves blocking doorways. As well as other illgal activity. Schools need to suspend and police need to arrest.
Micro aggressions, trigger warnings, safe spaces, cultural appropriation, and 50+ gender pronouns don’t exist because of conservatives. But, nice effort to flip the script. I’d be embarrassed of that , too. Good day, snowflakes!
Micro aggressions, trigger warnings, safe spaces, cultural appropriation, and 50+ gender pronouns don’t exist because of conservatives. But, nice effort to flip the script. I’d be embarrassed of that , too. Good day, snowflakes!
And yet, I’m not afraid of Halloween costumes.
And yet, I’m not afraid of Halloween costumes.
This is my comment pertaining to that other thread.
It makes it easier for you to presume that those things are widespread issues because they have names. Despite 95% of college students never discussing safe spaces or microaggressions, and despite the fact that many who do discuss those things also think they're ridiculous, you read an article or some far-left column and from your little antisocial bubble you assume it's happening everywhere. It's incredibly dumb.Micro aggressions, trigger warnings, safe spaces, cultural appropriation, and 50+ gender pronouns don’t exist because of conservatives. But, nice effort to flip the script. I’d be embarrassed of that , too. Good day, snowflakes!
Meanwhile conservatives literally legislate against things that offend them, like gay marriage, anti-obscenity legislation, etc. The still-ongoing reaction to Colin Kaepernick has been much more widespread among conservatives than all of those things combined. You would rather focus on funny buzzwords that very few people in the real world concern themselves with.
Find one post on this forum where a liberal advocates for safe spaces. One.
Conservatism at its core is resistance to change. You flip out so much at the idea of progress that you elect re ed reality TV hosts to the highest office in the land.
Lol tide pods
screaming liberal snowflake jpeg used as proof incoming
"People" like the president, who has railed against "fake news", called the media "enemy of the people", pushed for harsher libel laws so he can sue people like some penny ante dictator, said some journalists should be in prison?
The threat seems pretty obvious to me, but it isn't your preferred narrative.
Darrin, like most conservatives, is pretty much committed to his strawmen. Good luck piercing that viel of delusion with the spear of reality.
Literally baffled that I follow something within my field. Contrary to belief, not everyone has to Google this to be aware of them.What does CRISPR have to do with the safe space conversation in this thread? Seems like you just Googled Berkeley too...
The public's awareness of each university has nothing to do with it. Rest assured if CNN was covering protests on Liberty's campus every month, more people would have heard of it. That's the point.
I mentioned that fact, along with the other two schools, to show you the level of academics that Berkeley has. A very prestigious public university vs a private school should be held to the same standards? I suppose your also one of those idiots that get butt hurt about Facebook's TOS also?
How is your comparison between those schools different than a statue of Jesus outside a private school versus a public one?
So under 5% enrollment at Berkely was the advocate for this safe space?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ing-to-campus/
So 150 people we can't even say are all students are the problem at Berkeley?
It's disingenuous to suggest the distinction between Public and Private is the concern for people who obsess over Berkeley controversies.
I have no idea what the percentage is at Berkeley, nor do I care. I was talking about college students as a whole.
It's not two colleges. It's a serious threat to this country.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions