Reply With Quote
exactly. I predict the Jazz make it, and the Lakers will also be a new team to make it (just bc of LeBron). One (every year) injury to AD and the Pels slide to 9th. And the Nugz I will never believe in.
I credit these predictions more to overhyping of the Jazz, Nuggets, and Pels. Not to say they won’t do well, but I bet at least one of those teams goes fishing when 8 other teams are hitting the postseason
exactly. I predict the Jazz make it, and the Lakers will also be a new team to make it (just bc of LeBron). One (every year) injury to AD and the Pels slide to 9th. And the Nugz I will never believe in.
true. a prediction is only as accurate as the model it is based on.
I can understand why they have our guys rated the way they do. I hope they prove all the doubters wrong though.
I'd go the other way. Models are only as good as the predictions they make. A model that only describes the present has almost no value. That goes double for models that allow folks to believe guys like Kyle Anderson and Robert Covington are more impactful than guys like DeRozan and Aldridge. Mind you, the stats that are used for the basis of that comparison are fine when contextualized appropriately, but the model used here fails to do that.
I think they'll make the playoffs and challenge 50 wins if everything goes right, but it's not outrageous to predict that they'll miss the playoffs..the difference between the Spurs/Nuggets/Wolves/Pelicans/Lakers/Blazers and even Utah/OKC is negligible..it'll probably be determined by injuries and luck..
This team is very difficult to predict, though..last year's team won 47 without anything from Kawhi, but they also beat up on the easiest schedule in the NBA to inflate their record early on(easier to do at that point while other teams don't have continuity yet)..OTOH, they lost like 10 games by 4th quarter meltdowns/blown double-digit leads directly attributed to the lack of a go-to perimeter option..
It's natural to assume that Aldridge won't be as good as last year, I'd bet anything against it..the defense will never be bad under Pop, but it's going to be significantly worse with DeRozan starting and Belinelli in the rotation(along with Bertans playing more)..
The shooting improved on the bench, but they're going to be using Murray/DeRozan/Aldridge/Gay as the highest usage players in 2018..disgusting.
Also have to consider the free bleeding that will come from DeRozan and Aldridge, never know how they'll feel at any point of the season
No one believes in him anymore except me but Forbes will come up big this season. Book it.
For sure this is swaying things along with I saw it looks like point differential played a role.
I think SA wins at least 47 like last year but I do think they have more downside than most teams they are jumbled up with due to lack of defense and awkward fit.
I've always been on Team Forbes, tbh.
I think they'll make the playoffs and challenge 50 wins if everything goes right, but it's not outrageous to predict that they'll miss the playoffs..the difference between the Spurs/Nuggets/Wolves/Pelicans/Lakers/Blazers and even Utah/OKC is negligible..it'll probably be determined by injuries and luck..
This team is very difficult to predict, though..last year's team won 47 without anything from Kawhi, but they also beat up on the easiest schedule in the NBA to inflate their record early on(easier to do at that point while other teams don't have continuity yet)..OTOH, they lost like 10 games by 4th quarter meltdowns/blown double-digit leads directly attributed to the lack of a go-to perimeter option..
It's natural to assume that Aldridge won't be as good as last year, I'd bet anything against it..the defense will never be bad under Pop, but it's going to be significantly worse with DeRozan starting and Belinelli in the rotation(along with Bertans playing more)..
The shooting improved on the bench, but they're going to be using Murray/DeRozan/Aldridge/Gay as the highest usage players in 2018..disgusting.
Also have to consider the free bleeding that will come from DeRozan and Aldridge, never know how they'll feel at any point of the season
Stat based models are one thing, but to opine that they'll miss, though not outrageous, is still disrespectful to the organization and specifically Aldridge/DeRozan. To paraphrase Riley, what about the residue of winning?
It's easy to criticize their archaic styles, but Aldridge has been the best or 2nd best player on essentially 5 straight 50+ win teams, in the West (I'm counting last season, since they easily eclipse it with relative health). DeRozan has been the 2nd best player on 3 straight 50+ win teams and the 2 seasons prior, they won 49 and 48. (I realize in the East and their best lineup has generally been Lowry + the 2nd unit, but still). They've also both been durable.
y’all trippin. a demar derozan led team out west is a lottery team tbh
Good thing its a LaMarcus led team which we’ve seen get to the playoffs.y’all trippin. a demar derozan led team out west is a lottery team tbh
Bahahaha. Welcome to Spurstalk.y’all trippin. a demar derozan led team out west is a lottery team tbh
This is my thought initially since we lost Danny and KA without bringing any wings back that can defend well. Hopefully derozan isn't a got and tries to play some D
Last season was filled with easily spilled leads.
Another closer next to LMA was missing.
They've got it now + White & Murray's development. Also, 2nd unit will be beastly again.
Mind you, all that gets you by in the regular season. The playoffs are a different beast. The dissecting of the teams flaws can then rightfully begin.
538 is abc is espn
Dejounte and White will improve our defense a little but the defensive deficit will still be great unless DeMar surprises us.
Offensively, a better Dejounte, White, Belli, and DeRozan should easily cover plus more with the offense a d spacing that we will get.
The argument that they snuck into the playoffs last year by 1 game is countered by the fact they missed the Top 4 & home court by 1 game. Spurs could very well have made the 2nd round last year if they'd faced the Blazers, Thunder or anyone else bar HOU/GS in 1st.
Stats models aren't good enough to predict seasons yet. Advanced stats are useful to analyze what has happened and can help to predict what will happen on a single game but still aren't complex enough to predict in the long term.
I think the low class of the league will improve respect past season. GSW is the only real contender and the followers are HOU and BOS if they are healthy and their pieces fit well. Behind them, there is a big group of playoff teams where the Spurs are. Injuries, in-season movements in the roster, team play, roles adaptation and chemistry will make the differences. I don't think Spurs has more or fewer chances of making the playoffs than any other team in that group. Variables are the same to all of them.
Can Spurs play good defense? can they make their offense work with the lack of 3pt shooters? will everybody find a role where can be helpful to the team and be happy? will the new adapt and the young progress? will the team be able of closing the games (this is a real concern to me)? Answers will set the winning record for the season, there are no stats that can answer yet.
I’m hoping Barkley picks the Spurs to finish last in Division! That would guarantee us a high seed.
Whatever.... They just assured we end up top 4.....ESPN= Every,Stupid,Predictable,Nobrainer!!
Dejounte and White will improve our defense a little but the defensive deficit will still be great unless DeMar surprises us.
Offensively, a better Dejounte, White, Belli, and DeRozan should easily cover plus more with the offense and spacing that we will get.
white wont start. dude barely played last year. we wont be that much better offensively because Derozan is a ballhog and cant shoot 3s and beli is not a starter. we need a 3&D player really bad.
So adding a 25 point scorer will mame the Spurs worse than last year? These dudes get paid to spit . Im jelly.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
