CNN Waives Marc Lamont Hill

[Pavlov]

That "someone" will certainly be you focusing on piddly or false stuff...

You'll spend hours on a nothing sandwich, which is why everyone who has ever been your 'nemesis' has eventually walked away. The history doesn't lie.

Then all that's left for you is to walk away to fulfill your narrative.

That'll show me.

[Spurtacular]

Then all that's left for you is to walk away to fulfill your narrative.

That'll show me.

You have to make up narratives.
You can't help yourself.

[Pavlov]

You have to make up narratives.
You can't help yourself.

denying your own narrative.

Just walk away, derp. Isn't that what you're saying you're going to do?

[Spurtacular]

denying your own narrative.

Just walk away, derp. Isn't that what you're saying you're going to do?

I'm not saying I am or not. I'm figure that's perhaps got to be the likely thing at some point given the history.

Why do you think everyone walks away from you?

[Pavlov]

I'm not saying I am or not. I'm figure that's perhaps got to be the likely thing at some point given the history.

Then get on with it.

Or stay and ruin your own narrative.

lol

[Spurtacular]

Then get on with it.

Or stay and ruin your own narrative.

lol

Why do you think everyone walks away from you?

[Pavlov]

Why do you think everyone walks away from you?

Define walk away and give examples.

Stick around and discuss me some more.

[ElNono]

That name sounds like somebody Dwight Howard would be dating, tbh...

[Spurtacular]

Define walk away and give examples.

Stick around and discuss me some more.

There are no examples of anyone that stuck around. Stop stalling and tell me why you think everyone walks away from you.

[Pavlov]

There are no examples of anyone that stuck around. Stop stalling and tell me why you think everyone walks away from you.

I asked you for examples of those who walked away derp.

Who walked away?

[Spurtacular]

I asked you for examples of those who walked away derp.

Who walked away?

And I called out your stalling technique proper. Are you trying to argue that nobody has walked away from you?

[DMC]

That name sounds like somebody Dwight Howard would be dating, tbh...

Howard split him from river to sea.

[Pavlov]

And I called out your stalling technique proper. Are you trying to argue that nobody has walked away from you?

If you can't name any examples, yes -- I am arguing that.

[Spurtacular]

If you can't name any examples, yes -- I am arguing that.

So, you're claiming that nobody has ever walked away from you? Or are you putting these conditions on it.

[Pavlov]

So, you're claiming that nobody has ever walked away from you?

Yes.

Give some examples.

[Spurtacular]

Yes.

Give some examples.

I think you may be looking to quibble over the term "walk away". The reality is you've had 'rivals' over the years that have come and gone; and yet, you're still here. Why do you think that is?

[Pavlov]

I think you may be looking to quibble over the term "walk away". The reality is you've had 'rivals' over the years that have come and gone; and yet, you're still here. Why do you think that is?

Examples?

[Spurtacular]

Examples?

Are you arguing that these 'rivals' haven't existed? Why would I need to go digging for you?

At how much you're willing to evade such simple questions.

[Pavlov]

Are you arguing that these 'rivals' haven't existed?

Yes. Prove me wrong.

Why would I need to go digging for you?

It's your claim. Back it up.

At how much you're willing to evade such simple questions.

You're the one who says these "rivals" exist.

Give examples or yourself again.

[Spurtacular]

Yes. Prove me wrong.


It's your claim. Back it up.

You're the one who says these "rivals" exist.

Give examples or yourself again.

No surprises that you're quibbling over terms. There have many in your deep past who you consistently engaged in your back and forth exchanges. They pretty much all left you eventually. That is the standard outcome. Why do you think that is?

[Pavlov]

No surprises that you're quibbling over terms. There have many in your deep past who you consistently engaged in your back and forth exchanges.

Who?

Who isn't a term.

[Spurtacular]

Who?

Who isn't a term.

I never said 'who' was a term you're quibbling over. Anyways, you're demonstrating part of my original point; that you're (extremely) trite.

[Pavlov]

I never said 'who' was a term you're quibbling over. Anyways, you're demonstrating part of my original point; that you're (extremely) trite.

And you're demonstrating my point that you yourself whenever I ask you to explain yourself.

Just one name, derp.

[Spurtacular]

And you're demonstrating my point that you yourself whenever I ask you to explain yourself.

Just one name, derp.

What needs to explained? Your current truth is that there was nobody you consistently had long exchanges with before me. That's obviously false; the whole board knows it. You can't acknowledge simple realities; that's a character flaw even for a sociopath, tbh.

[Pavlov]

What needs to explained? Your current truth is that there was nobody you consistently had long exchanges with before me. That's obviously false; the whole board knows it. You can't acknowledge simple realities; that's a character flaw even for a sociopath, tbh.

You can't name even one.

lol derp