Reply With Quote
You're free to change the Cons ution if the current census clauses trigger you so badly.
ass liberals here want illegals to count for allocation of US govt funds..(IE TAXPAYERS)
That's the only reason they give a flying F about the census oh and GERRYMANDERING Congressional districts
Imagine that...a US citizen against his own interests...
How about skip all the immigration BS and all well meaning liberals find a poor immigrant family somewhere on Earth to send THEIR money to
Im sure some snowflake can design an app for that and save the rest of us from paying
You're free to change the Cons ution if the current census clauses trigger you so badly.
OK junior,the citizenship question has been used in various US Census forms before..
Which you'd know if you weren't a complete dumbass
NO,You're free to educate yourself if reading wasn't beyond your 3rd grade comprehension
That's your opinion. I'm allowed to call it ludicrous. You love iden y politics. You love smearing.
Never said otherwise. This is your strawman.It also seems to have escaped you that the US Census is unrelated to law enforcement.
Actually it wasn't asked of every single person filling out the census form ever.
Sorry. Get to changing det Cons ution. Nothing is stopping you.
LMFAO,dumbass liberal is dumbass liberal...
The Cons ution is deliberately vague on that...
Which of course you'd know unless you were just
Reading Google and aren't a US citizen.
OR are you for that NON US CITIZENS/TAX PAYERS should have any say or right to US taxpayers money or any sort of political representation???
An honest answer at least..
BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT THE BOTTOM LINE IS!
Bottom line is cons ution bad now?
How about 3/5 compromise?
Cons ution prohibits what?
Noncitizens have always had proportionate political representation.
It's explicitly stated in the Cons ution.
Nothing vague about it.
This is the first time anyone has used the word "prohibit" in this thread.
Thanks for the straw man.
How does cons ution relate to this census question
No one is depriving you of your chance to say anything you want, no matter how silly it makes you look. Have at.
Actually, you are way more into iden y politics than me, to judge by pattern of posting. I'm more of a general current events guy on this board, but you seem to specialize in idpol grievance.
Saying that DJT doesn't demonize immigrants is factually incorrect.Never said otherwise. This is your strawman.
What is this mess of a post?
Looks fine to me.
I'd flip that question around tbh.
BULL ING idiot
Citizens and only citizens have the absolute right to be physically present in the USA
Anyone else can off
Got that edit in just in time
Sorry, this is still an opinion no matter how many times you say it.
We the People included non-citizens according to Pavlov.
that's not what the census is, snowflake.
I'll take the bait and raise you a hundred years of relevancy How about black violent crime rates????
Riddle me this ...what major US city has an all white area where black people are assaulted /robbed on a regular basis...hmmmm
The census has always included noncitizens.
We the People made it that way.
Sorry.
as a matter of law, you're 100% wrong about that. it's still 100% legal to apply for asylum in the USA, regardless of the manner of entry.
Ah, never pass up a chance to be racist
If questions pertaining to citizenship are inappropriate then why bother asking questions pertaining to humans at all
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
