this thread isn’t about Trump anyways.
What’s your take on Warren, hater? Is her populist rhetoric to be believed? Or she’s gonna shill for the bankers in the end?
well search is disabled son
i remember very well. but no worries I will take your word today. Trump does not trigger you![]()
this thread isn’t about Trump anyways.
What’s your take on Warren, hater? Is her populist rhetoric to be believed? Or she’s gonna shill for the bankers in the end?
Trash fellators and rightwinghatemedia trying to trash Warren for ONE questionable, mostly fabricated instance?
versus
Trash's 1000s of ing lies?
![]()
![]()
![]()
While it’s true that the fake outrage is real, it’s still wrong, whether Trump or Warren do it
Warren was let go/replaced, but not explicitly FIRED, because she was pregnant. Where's her "lie"?
the crux of her statement is true
vs
Trash's pure top-to-bottom LIES
Traitor Trump : 13,000 lies, rapes, sex assaults, bribery, fraud, tax evasion, treason
Trump cult: "non issue!"
Obama = 1 (alleged) lie (keep your doctor)
Warren = 2 (alleged) lies
HRC = butteremails!
Trump cult (clutching their pearls) : "whaaaaaa!"
^ another example of whataboutism. We should be able to agree that conning and lying is bad regardless of who does it
Nope.
That was pre- trump - pre GOP sellout to russia
No moral leg to stand on ever -
If you were ok with Trump doing it - then GFY - you have no room, period.
Anything is fair game - anything - and NO ONE has a moral high road. This is what you get when you support this traitor -
don't whine about any criminality in the future.
So where's your Trump is lying thread?
Just breakin' it down. If you had been an outspoken Obama critic it would come to mind easily I would think.
Muh whataboutism
![]()
Muh lookoverhereandnotoverthereism
THAT'S DIFFERENT 98D CHESS TO PWN TEH COMMIE NAZIS
Breaking what down? You don't remember, remember?![]()
Bringin' it to the stark reality. Your light strokes against Obama hardly make you much of a critic.
FWIW, few contemporaneous posters would mistake El Nono for an Obama fanboy.
You weren't around in 2008 under this avatar, what did you call yourself then?
My post history speaks for myself on this, tbh. Go take a look at it if you're so curious.
The comparison does seem valid just on the basis of relative volume.
Indeed it does. You are far from a staunch critic of Obama.
You pick a lot of fights that make little sense. Maybe it's just irascibility.
but you don't remember! crofl
Let me refresh your mind:
I was a staunch critic of Obamacare, Obama's signature legislation.
I was a staunch critic of Obama failed promise to close Gitmo.
I was a staunch critic of Obama's wiretapping and persecution of Snowden.
I was a staunch critic of Obama (and all Dems) continued renewal of the Patriot Act.
I was a staunch critic of Obama the warmonger.
That's just off the top of my head. Easily verifiable. You're just too lazy and I'm not going to do your work for you, because, frankly, I don't seek validation like you do. My post history does clearly speaks for me.
That would involve searching and reading. A very tall ask for Spurtacular.
It's much easier for him to pursue inferences based on whatever he already thought before the conversation started.
Yea, you swung some pulled punches. I already acknowledged that.
You still don't get it. It doesn't matter what you acknowledge or not acknowledge. You're not the arbiter of anything.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)