Reply With Quote
For three years = $4.5 million, genius.More like $1.5 mil per.
Really? You were a key figure in their discussions I see.
So Pop can get Holt to sign Parker to a big ass contract extention but he can't get Holt to sign Brown or Evans?It's fairly obvious. But recognizing that isn't your strong suit.
Is that what you're tell me?
It seems Pop has less power than you thought.
Or maybe Pop just didn't think they were a need.
For three years = $4.5 million, genius.More like $1.5 mil per.
If you were paying attention you would know.
Seems like Pop's being limited and he had to fight tooth and nail to get Holt to do the obvious and extend Parker before he got a max offer the following offseason.So Pop can get Holt to sign Parker to a big ass contract extention but he can't get Holt to sign Brown or Evans?
Is that what you're tell me?
It seems Pop has less power than you thought.
$1.5 mil per is more germane, Einstein.
So Pop seeing how Parker was a need for the team in order to continue to repeat fought tooth and nail with Holt to get him an extention instead of try and get him as a FA.
Yet Pop didn't fight tooth and nail for Brown or Evans?
Hmmm.....
4.5 is the total deal, which matters more to an owner.
Listed at 6'5" which means 6'4"at most. Spurs need somebody 6'7" to 6'9" athletic, strong defense minded to guard the Melos, Artests, Lewises, not another 6'4" shooting guard. There are a dozen Maurice Evans up for grabs every year.
Pop wanted at least one of them. When he couldn't knock some sense into Holt he tried to move the ageless Barry to keep Brown.
$3 million per is more germane if you really want to be pissy about it.
Exactly when does Mo crack the rotation over the four other swingmen? After his deal is up?
Is he a true small forward?
Not as much when the owner is fixated on the lux tax threshold.
I see. So what else can you tell us oh great insider...
I'm sure that's "exactly" how it all went down.
How can I think otherwise, you're the one sharing all this insider type info with us.
How much longer is Barry going to be useful? Since when did $1.5 mil per really become that big of a deal for a franchise that was willing to take on $9 mil in one case and $6.7 mil in another for players unwanted otherwise?
I see. So what else can you tell us oh great insider...
I'm sure that's "exactly" how it all went down.
How can I think otherwise, you're the one sharing all this insider type info with us.
Uh that's what transpired this offseason. Not really inside info.
But doesn't a bigger total deal mean a large per year salary? Yes, sometimes the contract is back heavy, but usually they're not. BUt eventually they will be.
Can you answer that?How much longer is Barry going to be useful?When it becomes $3 million per for a guy who will never see the floor.Since when did $1.5 mil per really become that big of a deal for a franchise that was willing to take on $9 mil in one case and $6.7 mil in another for players unwanted otherwise?
Actually, my bad. The Spurs took on $19 mil over 2 seasons for a player who they really didn't want.
35 year old perimeter player who was oft paralyzed with fear in the postseason and who was beat out by DBrown for his spot in the rotation.
Again, they've paid more to make guys go away.When it becomes $3 million per for a guy who will never see the floor.
The a scary part is that Spurs fans will about ownership when the team has won three les in 7 years and is favored to repeat.
Damn, should have gone with the Paul Allen type ownership formula.
You know, the kind that pays Derek Anderson a bunch of money to play on their team for 6 years.
The scary thing is that you can't distinguish between the contribution made by the management vis a vis ownership.
Damn, should have gone with the Paul Allen type ownership formula.
Nah, just an owner who will listen to his basketball people.
So your answer is last season? I'll let whott deal with that.35 year old perimeter player who was oft paralyzed with fear in the postseason and who was beat out by DBrown for his spot in the rotation.Yeah, they signed those guys as free agents when they were over the tax threshold and had no intention of their playing ever.Again, they've paid more to make guys go away.
It's all connected dip .
It's one big circuit.
You mean internet geeks like you?Nah, just an owner who will listen to his basketball people.
Connected? Not really. As long as Holt Cat listened to management there wasn't a problem.
Geek?
Your attempt to on the Spurs ownership has failed.
NeXt.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
