Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 58 of 58
  1. #51
    MannyIsGod
    Guest
    yeah cause manu is the sixth man on a championship team wtf are you thinking?

  2. #52
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    Parker keeps making emotionally-charged comments that are a result of his immaturity at age 21.

    Trade him to get Brand and then go get Arenas.

    I wonder what Parker's tune will be toiling for Sterling.

    Paqrker: Know your role and shut your mouth.




  3. #53
    Man in Black1
    Guest
    :brotha

    Answer the question posted above in my previous thread.

    :spam 2

  4. #54
    picnroll
    Guest
    Question: Why is Tmac in Orlando.
    Answer: He didn't want to be in the shadow of Vinsanity.

  5. #55
    Whottt
    Guest
    *Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaawn*

    I'd take TMAC...

    TMAC is 24 not 30.

    TMAC can excel in either a halfcourt offense or a transition offense.

    TMAC can be a dominant perimeter/guard scorer. See the 15 million posts I have made this year on why that helps Duncan more than some guy passing it to the same open guys that Duncan passes too.

    And finally both Manu and TMAC can play 3 positions...so that situation would never occur..Tony really can only play one. Manu is more of a 2 guard, TMAC is a SF forced to play guard like because of no help.

    I'd take TMAC..no TMAC really isn't a better franchise player or leader than Kidd is at this stage of the game...but we don't need a franchise player, we don't need leadership..we need scorers who can pull people off of Duncan's back.


    When you can finally make a pro Kidd argument not based on "If" you might make some headways in this argument.

    Edit: And I might add..If we were talking about adding TMAC this summer at the expense of Parker..I'd be saying see ya Tony..

  6. #56
    Aggie Hoopsfan
    Guest
    no TMAC really isn't a better franchise player or leader than Kidd is at this stage of the game...but we don't need a franchise player,
    Huh?

    AHF

  7. #57
    Whottt
    Guest
    AHF, IMO Jason Kidd can carry a team better than TMAC can at this point. Kidd is a better leader. Kidd is smarter. Kidd makes better use of his teamates than TMAC does...

    However, IMO that doesn't make Kidd a better fit for the Spurs and he wouldn't have the impact on this team that TMAC would. We need scoring in our back court to improve the Spurs..not passing, TO's, and bricks from a 30 year old running PG.

  8. #58
    Ghost Writer
    Guest
    Did Whott just say that Kidd could carry a team better than T-Mac could?

    Put Kidd on the Magic and they're a lottery team.


    Next.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •