Ok, that's your opinion. How about we try and see if it makes any difference? If it doesn't work then fine.
Spoken like a dumb cuck.
Ok, that's your opinion. How about we try and see if it makes any difference? If it doesn't work then fine.
This part just does not compute with them. It's weird.
Lol keep going, you're about to get on in this thread again.
...it's not weird. Don't act like you're going to stop if ever given a inch. You won't. We'll give (like we used to before President Trump)...you'll take, then you'll skin & grin with your side, point at us and make fun. Been there a thousand times.
So, no. You don't get anything. I wouldn't a even given you that we gave you two weeks ago. Those RINO s who signed off should all be voted out at their next election.
You were all for the mass killings when it was under President Trump's watch. So?
Let us proceed...
I'm fine with all three of your suggestions. Im just being realistic and pointing out it won't stop those crazy s from doing their thing. I will say again that if they quit publishing their names it would make a difference and is the easiest to do. Take out the "going out in a blaze of glory" factor.
:LOL coming from the excrement coated king of spurstalk who can never live down his whining on here about sancho banging his wife. Boo hoo boo hoo.![]()
They/State run media CNN & MSNBC are the only ones who "publish" and bear down on the shooter names and then only if they're White names.
Quick! Without looking:::what was the guy's name who shot up the NYC subway about 2 months ago? He Black.
"collectors"
Like a collector wants as many ARs as they can possibly get, then someone raids their home and finds a "cache of weapons"
Do you actually believe the you say?
Turd sent up the fart signal.. incoming fart.
What's statistically meaningful to you? You cannot reduce shootings in the past, only ones in the future. What number is acceptable that's not "fewer than would be otherwise".
Dude in Uvalde had a ing Daniels Defense AR with an EOTech sight. Over 3K worth of hardware, and someone here thinks the bump in price for a 30rnd mag would be prohibitive to someone willing to die to have their manifesto read on MSM.
Most other countries don't have the whining liberal gots in this thread, too bad.
multiple time obiden voter
cant believe there are actually people who whine about mass shootings tbh
what pussies
Neither Obama nor Biden are liberals.
Hard fail - again.
Obviously that's all they do.
Where is your magic wand to make them all disappear?
Losers doing suicide by cop aren't going to give a if their name rings out in the news. And why is it on the media to censor the news?
The whole point is to reduce these mass shooting to fewer than they would be otherwise. Regarding what number is acceptable to me...well I would most likely defer to the judgement of professional statisticians, perhaps working in law enforcement like the FBI, who could compile data and do analysis to conclude on what would be "statistically meaningful" decreases relative to my pretty modest proposals. If what they came up with seemed reasonable, then I would agree.
That's your opinion, and I think it's wrong. You can argue that based on our culture, it might not be as effective, but that doesn't mean it would be less effective than what we have now.
Lol derp
Good
Lots of fun with those to kill gophers
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)