Reply With Quote
Those are exactly who were being discussed when you inserted yourself into the conversation. Is James Woosley an alias for Mike Flynn, Steve Bannon, Eric Prince or Jared Kushner? Yes or no.
I discussed none of these. I was having a laugh at Woolsey and now I'm having a laugh at you.
We all know you just can't admit to simple truths. You're going to have to find another Satanic Panic angle to distract from today's indictment reveal. It's not great for your side.
And before you say muh Hunter again -- your Trump had four years to put all your enemies in GITMO like you said he would. My question to you is: what happened?
Those are exactly who were being discussed when you inserted yourself into the conversation. Is James Woosley an alias for Mike Flynn, Steve Bannon, Eric Prince or Jared Kushner? Yes or no.
Qtsa does not even know what he is saying anymore: "Woosley said he never worked for Flynn Intel Group," "Woolsey disputed that characterization," "lol no" (to CD's asking if Woolsey worked for Flynn Intel Group), "he was an unpaid adviser and his affiliation was “loosely defined,” "it is irrelevant."
Not by me. I was just struck by your outright denial of Woolsey's association with Flynn.
Now that we agree it did, in fact, exist, we're good until you choke on another fact.
Collected millions for what?
What are you saying Hunter, James and Sara Biden did for the ChiComs?
Be specific. The DOJ is.
Who was Individual 1?
the gears of justice revolve with agonizing slowness. such is legal process.
In January 2022, Democratic state attorneys general in Michigan, New Mexico and Wisconsin referred information about the elector scheme to the Justice Department, indicating that they believed the effort was coordinated by the Trump campaign nationally and would be best investigated by federal authorities. Those referrals ultimately resulted in the Justice Department probe now led by Smith.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions