Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 54 of 54
  1. #51
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,860
    the more they see it, the more they like it



  2. #52
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,860
    Sean Duffy keeps pissing his pants in public about subway safety

    Rank innumeracy at best, propaganda at worst

    (Sawyer County is Sean Duffy's home)

    www.bloomberg.com/opinion/arti...
    Last edited by Winehole23; 07-21-2025 at 10:10 AM.

  3. #53
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,860
    Driving a car pretty much anywhere is more dangerous than riding the subway. It's not even close.

  4. #54
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,860
    The main objective of congestion pricing was to raise money for transit under the simple premise that drivers, who cause congestion, pollution, road deaths and lost productivity, should be charged a small fee to bolster transit (which reduces all of the aforementioned deleterious effect of car driving in urban areas).


    Or, as Charles Komanoff put it this week in Vital City: "The theory underlying congestion charging is as close as economics ever comes to axiomatic: Society is made better off when the negatives (sometimes called externalities) of goods or activities are covered — that is, included — in their price."

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...-one-year.html
    https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2026/01/...for-the-better

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •