Reply With Quote
But you say you don't live here and never will again.
Yes, Trump will fold again and extend the deadline
No, high tariffs for penguins are back on the menu
I'm an idiot and think USA can negotiate and sign 90 trade treaties in next two weeks
"not chaos" isn't an answer to whether you were for or against Biden keeping Trump's tariffs and then adding or expanding tariffs on ev's, solar cells, semiconductors, steel and aluminum
Yes, as was Nancy Pelosi. I know whinehole used to be pro tariff until Trump beat Hillary. It's really not worth debating them on the actual pros/cons of tariffs, Trump bad is their only core position.
But you say you don't live here and never will again.
A lot of this domestic investment will create good paying full-time jobs for Americans, and those better jobs give them the ability to pay a little more for American made products.
Too many Americans are underemployed with poor paying jobs.
I think you nailed it, and that's what I was saying earlier. They're working backwards from the conclusion of "Trump supports it, so it's bad" to their reason for hating it.
LOL U jeS LashiNg oUt
Nope. That's the lazy take on it. The tariffs he's trying to impose are stupid because there's no need for them. Why do you want to pay more for stuff when you don't have to?
not that I recall, got a link for that?
neither of you can explain how Trump's tariffs are supposed to work or why that's good, so there's that
Pelosi was post NAFTA but same position
You know you can just ask GROK to find these things. It's fast & easy, try it old man. You can also search this forum for your own pro tariff position pre Trump.In a fiery 1996 speech on the House floor, Pelosi:
Opposed granting China Most Favored Nation (MFN) trade status, citing human rights abuses and unfair trade practices.
Called for reciprocal tariffs, pointing out that U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods averaged just 2%, while China imposed tariffs as high as 35% on American exports.
Warned of massive job losses, claiming that U.S.-China trade supported at least 10 million jobs in China but only 170,000 in the U.S..
Described the trade relationship as “the biggest and cruelest hoax of all” on American workers.
You don't know how tariffs work?
I wasn't on this board in 1996. I was aware of NAFTA, but mostly unaware of what Pelosi and Sanders were saying about it -- Democratic Party politics were not my thing
Not sure why you think you can read my mind on this
if you're for it, it's your burden to tell how they work and how we win
Nobody is obliged to entertain your playing dumb routine
I'm not playing dumb, you're either tongue-tied or you don't know what you're talking about
What year is it now?
Were you for NAFTA back then?
You won't talk about it. You never will.
Dumb traitor: “we have been getting ripped off for decades! So unfair and now we will stop it…blah blah lie lie lie”
dumb traitor five seconds later: “we are doing great, richest country in the world , all is perfect now that i stole the election”
yeah…no
either we are the richest country on the planet for the last hundred years because what we had was working well…
(not perfect- but still richest on the planet)
or
trump is lying as he has done 60-80,000 times in the past 10 years…
magats: “trump cannot lie he is incapable of lying!….trump trump trump usa usa usa!”
Watch Nancy Pelosi's speech and if you still don't get it then you may never.
Why are you not citing Reed Smoot or Willis Hawley?
A great idea is timeless, isn't it?
please describe it in your own words
can you?
the approximately total inability of horny right wing posters on this board to verbalize their own opinions
continues to amaze
Never will.
assume I do
go
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
