it'll do well
It's not the depiction of the giant ape that is "racist."
Nor is it really "racist" against black people, i.e. of African descent.
It's the depiction of Melanesians as wild savages* that could be problematic. (Last time I saw Vijay Singh on TV, he did not have a bone through his nose, nor was he trying to throw the other golfers into a cauldron.) The original just took that for granted, you know, "white man's burden" and all that. Jackson tried to take the edge off that by depicting the islanders as possessed zombies rather than being savage simply by virtue of being Melanesian; the reviewer seems to think that makes it worse rather than better.
But what can you say? The original was made in 1933. It reflects the at udes of the time. It is what it is. If you try to sanitize the material, you pretty much can't make the movie because the plot disintegrates.
*We won't talk about the Solomon Islands.
Thanks for turning this into an insult battle.
So you think he has some good points? That is the ridiculous part of this whole discussion. He has nothing to back up anything he says other than, "Hey it was made back in the day when everything was racist!" Yeah that's absolutely a great basis for making the charge that someone or thing is racist. I consider calling out racism where there is none something seriously inappropriate. It is just as bad as racism itself. Oh and thanks for breaking this down to insults."I think he brings up some good points about the story especially if you consider when in history the original was created."
you're welcome
1. It's ridiculous that I think the writer makes good points? Sounds like an personal attack to me.
2. When it was made is but one consideration. The writer also uses imagery of the ape being plucked from his native land and brought to the west, the dark-skinned natives acting like savages, and Kong's obsession with the white-skinned beauty to bolster his argument. You don't have to agree with the writer; I don't agree with him. But I do think he did do more than claim the movie has racist undertones without giving reasons as to why.
3. really? who cares?
4. you said that already
I can see where he gets his opinion and I don't know why but it is clear to me. Is he right? I don't know but I think he explains his view.
Opinions are based on facts or information the way the opinionee sees it.
What may offend or strike someone may not fly right over another person's head. It doesn't mean that the issue isn't there..it just may not be there for everyone.
I guess it is hard to explain.
Calling an idea ridiculous is not even close to calling someone re ed. You're stretching that just like the racism in Kong.
I see what symbolism the article writer is trying weave links between, but I can at step one call him out for such false accusations. If the writer uncovered some quotes from the director stating he made it as a smybolic reference to slavery or racial cultural differences, then I'd maybe give it an ounce of credit. But he doesn't even bother to push that aspect of his story. This is probably because this is just a load of BS trying to use race as a way to lure readers in. Flame pieces like this often cause more harm than good and detract from the real issues at hand.
That is a stereotype of the black male being an oversexed beast!!
![]()
Again, it is perception that I am talking about. If his perception is that it is somehow racist, and again I can see how, then it is not a false accusation simply because one does not agree with it.
But the with it. I'm waiting for the DVD!!!
which is why it's an opinion piece and not a biography of Merrian. The guy has an opinion and provides reasons for that opinion. I'm tired of discussing it.
....and I'm pretty sure there's been several *films* made about that.![]()
![]()
Did you ever see "Mandingo"?
I'm not saying the guy's not right because it's his opinion, I'm saying he's not right because he has no facts or basis other than his own opinion. I agree anyone can have an opinion about anything, that doesn't make them right.
Halle Berry couldnt act her way thru a 6th grade rendition of Rent.
Worst Oscar winner besides Marissa Tomei.
Hey, Marissa Tomei was great in My Cousin Vinny.
ding ding ding
You win! Marissa Tomei won best actress for her startling role in My Cousin Vinny!
"My biological clock is ticking...LIKE...THIS!"
![]()
You must not know great acting. Halle Berry is great actress!
Halle Berry Is a great actress.
No, she just looks great...it's clouding your judgement.![]()
My favorite line:
"Oh yeah...you blend."
people see what they want to see. the racists are the ones making the comparison. that war is over in case nobody noticed. racism is dead except in the minds and hearts of the ignorant.
exactly. im sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sick of everything having to be racist or sexist or whatever the else. and all this hate crime bull . i htink im goignto move to canada in the next coupole of years. im realy starting to not like the people who have control, in govt and media, over america.
I agree but thinking that racism doesn't exist is ignorant too.
Looks like you are one of the few who read racism into this movie or at least can see what the writer is referring to.
care to explain how the halle berry is a great actress??????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)