And get your facts straight, Iran doesn't have nuclear capabilities yet.
And get your facts straight, Iran doesn't have nuclear capabilities yet.
hey, YOUR THE ONE pointing...you just don't like it when i play your game, cuz i can do it better...![]()
like they would announce it?
Bush supporters can always play the blame game better when THEY feel it's necessary. You asked "wouldn't we have wanted to prevent Sept 11, 2001". Bush ignored the warning.
At least Clinton had meetings on Bin Laden every week. Bush had NONE until after Sept. 11. You couldn't spin that even if u tried.
okay, so in YOUR WORLD, the warnings started pouring in the day after Clinton left office....alrighty then.
coulda sworn there was an attack on a ship called Cole...coulda sworn there was a 1st attack on the WTC...maybe i'm just lost.
Clinton had meetings. wow....thank God for his meetings huh? really did us alot of good.
Seeing as just about every nuclear country shouts it from the rooftops when they achieve it, I'd say they would.like they would announce it?
Mushroom clouds from tests would probably be a tipoff as well.
No, not at all. But Clinton had meetings every week, just never caught him. Bush NEVER had ONE meeting. So knowing Bin Laden was a wanted terrorist, Bush didn't care, especially after the CIA briefing. There is No excuse.
Which shows the incompitence of Bush, to know this after he stole office and NOT have ONE meeting and ignore the CIA briefing.
Clinton's national security people warned dubya's team in the transition about bin Laden.
All dubya did was ram through the most unfair tax cuts in the nation's history, ignore the "airplanes into buildings" chatter over the summer, ignored the "learn to fly and turn an airplane, but not how to land", and went on holiday.
I bet if the Patriot Act had been in place in the 9 months before 9/11, 9/11 would have happened anyway. The $50B/year FBI/CIA/NSA people were NOT looking and listening, they were warming their ing chairs, and the PA wouldn't have made any difference.
Okay, so you guys blame bush for that too. why am i not suprised?
ever think maybe he blames himself too?
maybe THAT is WHY he is so steadfast now. maybe THAT is why he wants to take it to the terrorists to make sure it never happens again.
and CD, the Iranian gov't KNOW's the heat is on with regard to their nuclear capabilities, they are gonna keep it hush hush as long as possible...it's in their best interests.
Until they actually get the bomb.and CD, the Iranian gov't KNOW's the heat is on with regard to their nuclear capabilities, they are gonna keep it hush hush as long as possible...it's in their best interests.
that would be a very dangerous time for the world. but it's coming.![]()
Is Bin Laden in Iraq?
![]()
bin laden is in the proximity of islamabadd.
the insurgents flooding into iraq are patsies.
i'm sure our gov't knows this, however, until the iraqi's are able to fend for themselves in the face of these attacks that are to STOP democracy in Iraq, the US shall remain.
i fear AlQuaida have landed in the US already. i'm more worried about nuclear weapons already within our borders....atlanta, houston, dallas. i fear for our people.
He's just wants it to be going and going and going and going......
![]()
![]()
You should claim your reward for pointing out his location.
BigZak, have you collected the reward?
![]()
knowing where is only half the battle.
BROKEN RECORD
He does sound that way, doesn't he?
More than half the Country disagrees with you.
What? according to you polls again?
Why don't we poll the military that is actually DOING THE FIGHTING.
WHY DON'T WE POLL THE IRAQI PEOPLE? OH wait, 80% turned out to vote.
That means 80% want to be part of their new democracy.
That sounds like a good percentage to me.
You don't want to see THAT number though do you.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)