Bush OR Saddam

[SA210]

^^^another personality.

[gtownspur]

^another pussyassed .

[ChumpDumper]

So could there be a poll with the choices:

Bush as US President

or

300,000 in Darfur hacked to death with machetes?

[Oh, Gee!!]

Ice Cream for Dessert

or

Eggs for breakfast.

Are you brave enough to make a choice? Well then, I applaud your courage.

[SA210]

^another pussyassed .

Another homerotic message from gtown.

[smeagol]

Why do the people with less than 10 posts who start polls, usually start polls which make little sense?

[danyel]

Ice Cream for Dessert

or

Eggs for breakfast.

Are you brave enough to make a choice? Well then, I applaud your courage.

Ice Cream for Dessert, breakfast is so overrated in the US...

[zeleni]

Is there a choice? Who makes the call, please?

[gtownspur]

So could there be a poll with the choices:

Bush as US President

or

300,000 in Darfur hacked to death with machetes?

WTF? you're high. The Sudanese wars had been raging long before Bush was president.

[gtownspur]

Another homerotic message from gtown.

If what i said about you was erotic, then you'd be the only one on hear who found it erotic.

[Chairman Kim]

Well....if this isn't a clear sign of the end of times... Bush is not only doing well, but is leading in the polls. That has to be a 1st.

Kim Jong Il

[ChumpDumper]

WTF? you're high. The Sudanese wars had been raging long before Bush was president.

Sorry, dufus -- the Darfur slaughters started in 2003.

[Yonivore]

Bush or Saddam? Hmmm...let me think...okay, let's go to the video:

Site's disclaimer [a suggestion I would heed]:

WARNING: This material is extremely shocking and graphic in nature. It should not be viewed by children. Also, it may be necessary to turn the volume down before watching the 4 separate chapters.

Please note, each chapter may take several minutes to download.

Chapter 1

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

Source: Saddam's Entertainment

[Mr. Peabody]

Bush or Saddam? Hmmm...let me think...okay, let's go to the video:

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious.

[Yonivore]

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious.

The fact the question was even asked is absurd. I didn't start this thread, direct your incredulity at them. In fact, it is they that suggest Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.

But, I'm glad I amused.

[SA210]

The same could be said for America. Some people actually suggest that America's better off under Bush. But that's not true.

[xrayzebra]

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious.

The fact that you find this hilarious, is sickening.

[Mr. Peabody]

The fact the question was even asked is absurd. I didn't start this thread, direct your incredulity at them. In fact, it is they that suggest Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.

But, I'm glad I amused.

I've already commented on the absurdity of the poll.

And when you say "they" in the above statement, are you referring to the "ass-tappers"?

[Mr. Peabody]

The fact that you feel that you must bring in evidence to help people make the choice is hilarious.

The fact that you find this hilarious, is sickening.

Did you not understand my post?

[mookie2001]

TRO that font, size and color did look scary

[Oh, Gee!!]

The fact the question was even asked is absurd. I didn't start this thread, direct your incredulity at them. In fact, it is they that suggest Iraqis were better off under Saddam Hussein.

But, I'm glad I amused.

I find the question absurd as well, but probably for a different reason than you. The question is absurd because choosing one doesn't necessarily mean that you would have to choose it to the exclusion of the other. After all, Saddam did lead the nation of Iraq for a brief time while Dubya lead our nation. They are not mutually exclusive choices.

[SA210]

If what i said about you was erotic, then you'd be the only one on hear who found it erotic.

Another post from gtown when he comes in here late at night when noone is on, then sneaks away to avoid anyone telling him to stop his sexual references.

[Nbadan]

Were killing Iraqis at 10x the rate Saddam did, but we've also poured tens of billions of dollars of direct-aid and infra-structure improvements in the country. The problem is that the U.S. can't afford to rebuild Iraq on it's own and the Chinese, the Russians the Euro's and the UN are still stuck in the 'you broke it, you bought it mentality'. As well they should be because the U.S. went into Iraq, toke control of the Oil Ministry and all the foreign-run wells, and then arrogantly gave all the major rebuilding contracts to American crony companies with connections to high-paid Washington lobbyist.

Iraq is as bungled a mess as the Bush Administration and Washington.

[Mr. Peabody]

I find the question absurd as well, but probably for a different reason than you. The question is absurd because choosing one doesn't necessarily mean that you would have to choose it to the exclusion of the other. After all, Saddam did lead the nation of Iraq for a brief time while Dubya lead our nation. They are not mutually exclusive choices.

You can use logic to prove anything....