Reply With Quote
Tall ball is not dead lol....
If you took say Jason Kidds mind.. and UPLOADED it into Nazr...
ERASING DOG BRAIN>> STAND BY>>> UPLOADING NBA GENIUS SERIES...
He is just stubborn. He hasn't learn a thing in this season, so I'm very pesimistic about the next one.
Tall ball is not dead lol....
If you took say Jason Kidds mind.. and UPLOADED it into Nazr...
ERASING DOG BRAIN>> STAND BY>>> UPLOADING NBA GENIUS SERIES...
Last year we rolled Phoenix (who was playing small ball) with Tim and Nazr both starting and playing side by side.
The only thing that changed from last year to this Mavs series was Pop got stupid.
Did Pop comment on leaving the obviously tired Duncan etc in for the entire Overtime?
Also when we got the prayer foul call to make it 115-111 instead of 115-110, why did he insist on going for the three pointer?
Sure two 115-113 puts a lot of pressure on the Mavs foul shooter.
The final play drawn up to have Tim shoot the three pointer.
Was that a broken play or more of Pops strategy?
If he'd bench the best player in the league for the last 5 minutes, I would personally cut off his balls. He can't be THAT stupid!!
Pop did say that Tim had to stay at the arena for two hours after the game and get a couple of bags of IV fluid. His whole body was cramping up, but you still don't take him out.
Manu hadn't done all year.
Beno and Rasho have both sucked since they were wet dreams.
I don't understand why oh in why we have to get to this point for Popovich to understand.
Last year Pop could put Tim on Pheonix's 2 guard and let Amare tear apart Nazr, because the Suns weren't going to play defense and weren't a great rebounding team.
When Avery went to the two point guard line-up, even with his foot looking better, Timmy can't run around with Terry, Harris, or Howard.
Plus, Dallas will play some defense, and isn't bad on the boards, which means we needed stops. We couldn't just let somebody eat Nazr alive on the defensive end.
There was no problem leaving Dunca in for all of OT. The problem was running every single play on offense for him when he was obviously gassed.Did Pop comment on leaving the obviously tired Duncan etc in for the entire Overtime?
And then you eat them alive at the other end with your size like we did to Phoenix last year, and have better rebounding and shot blocking around to boot.Plus, Dallas will play some defense, and isn't bad on the boards, which means we needed stops. We couldn't just let somebody eat Nazr alive on the defensive end.
Thank you. Yeah the 112-108 offensive play especially. Real momentum killer when Tim was too gassed to toss it three feet to the rim. Manu, why the *&^% did you have to foul Dirk at end of reg?
Is there anyway to re-listen to this?
it should be online tomorrow
bumb it and it will remind me to look for the link for you
This is where the regular season can be used as a measuring stick. Neither Nazr or Rasho showed the ability to eat Dallas alive at any point during the first 4 meetings.
While Dirk will never be confused with a great defender, I can't see Nazr or Rasho dominating him in the low post. And he's more discipline than Amare was last year, who would go for the block on every drive and leave a lot of open dunks/lay-ups to be had by the Spurs bigs.
Truth be told, since we did lose, I would have rather gone down playing with our best line-up than playing Dallas on their terms. But if the Spurs don't do basically everything wrong after Manu's 3 last night, we'd just be hearing about another situation where San Antonio adjusted and beat an opponent at their own game.
Thanks.
So it means Pop like Hedo..........or Hedon'tComment of the show so far is Pop saying the Spurs need a Derrick McKey type. For those who don't remember McKey, he was a long three.
Long three!
Finally
12/1/2005: Spurs win 92-90.Neither Nazr or Rasho showed the ability to eat Dallas alive at any point during the first 4 meetings.
Rasho with 6 and 7.
Nazr with 10, 5, and a block.
3/2/2006: Spurs win 98-89 (note this is when Pop was starting Nazr)
Nazr: 10 points, 5 boards, 1 block.
You wouldn't have taken 10, 5, and 1 when Horry was giving us 4 points, 3 boards, and 0 blocks in this series?
Can anyone give a quick recap of the pop show?
The only thing that changed from last year to this Mavs series was Pop got stupid.
Or, maybe, Dallas is better?
nahh.
12/1/2005: Spurs win 92-90.
Rasho with 6 and 7.
Nazr with 10, 5, and a block.
3/2/2006: Spurs win 98-89 (note this is when Pop was starting Nazr)
Nazr: 10 points, 5 boards, 1 block.
You wouldn't have taken 10, 5, and 1 when Horry was giving us 4 points, 3 boards, and 0 blocks in this series?
Both games, no Devin Harris.
dirk is better
he will never be this good again in postseason
BOOK IT
10/5/1 is not dominating. And Nazr/Rasho would have given up much more than that in the difference on the other end. And with Dallas' line-up adjustment, they (or timmy) would have been forced to guard a shooter, it would have pulled them away from the hoop and negated much of that rebounding advantage (for two centers who aren't great on the defensive boards as is).12/1/2005: Spurs win 92-90.
Rasho with 6 and 7.
Nazr with 10, 5, and a block.
3/2/2006: Spurs win 98-89 (note this is when Pop was starting Nazr)
Nazr: 10 points, 5 boards, 1 block.
You wouldn't have taken 10, 5, and 1 when Horry was giving us 4 points, 3 boards, and 0 blocks in this series?
I never said 10/5/1 was dominating, I just said it would have been more than we were getting from Horry, and enough to pick up one of those close losses we suffered.
Some of you I give up on. What we were doing didn't work. Why not at least try something different instead of letting Dallas kick our teeth in time after time?
Damn, we still have some ing idiots masquerading as Spurs fans...
Why don't you just ing give up completely? If you truly believe that putting either Nazr or Rasho in was going to help us, you are a complete moron. The reasons have already been given ad infinitum.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
