Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 73 of 73
  1. #51
    Veteran Slinkyman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    1,740
    why is everyone so high on Ben? Sheed is the better one on one defender and he was the one who had the most success on Tim last year in the Finals, Sheed > Ben plus Sheed can hit the 3 and has a decent low post game. A starting line up of Parker, Gino, Bowen, Sheed, and Tim would be killer next season.

  2. #52
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    Yeah, it'd be great to have Wade in our lineup too, but I think it's safe to say you won't be seeing him or either of the Wallaces here next year.

  3. #53
    draft bust
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    1,688
    Slinky
    why because we SUCK SUCK totaly at rebounding
    ben wallace can rebound

    [edited in Rasheed]wallace would demand shots
    we want to FEED shots into TIm and then have him dish it out for a three pointer. or want us to use our slashers manu and tony to take it to the hole

    we suck at center comapretely then we do at 4 (assuming tim refuses toplay center)
    that means we have for a center.

    Ben wallace plays defense, he rebounds, he won't take shots away from or other players, and most importantly he cannot hit a free throw that makes him spurs materal

    I think it is realsitic to want ben wallace. He is avilable there have been trade rumors. He has said he will refuse to play with flip and their GM said we will keep flip. What were chances shaq would leave a championship team like lakers. Now the problem I do see with walalce is you have 2 libalities on Ofense bowen and ben. But then again rasho isn't lighting up the board to much either. I think getting ben just proves we NEED an upgrade at the 3 spot. WHo woudl be my perfect 3. Soem one like sean elliot with nija skills. That is why when Ron Artest was avilable I wanted to go after him. He isn't avilable but I think we need someone to replace bowen espcially if you don't have a dominant scorer in there like ian.
    Last edited by clubalien; 06-10-2006 at 02:01 PM.

  4. #54
    draft bust
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    1,688
    In the end I think the most likely outcome is we sign javk because he will be cheaper. Reason we traded for nazr was to get rid of roses contract and draft picks that would cost us money. Holt won't pay anyone. So I think the question is whether ben wallace is cheaper than javk not if ben wallce is better. However if we could trade rasho we woudl be able to have both.

  5. #55

    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    3,999
    why is everyone so high on Ben? Sheed is the better one on one defender and he was the one who had the most success on Tim last year in the Finals, Sheed > Ben plus Sheed can hit the 3 and has a decent low post game. A starting line up of Parker, Gino, Bowen, Sheed, and Tim would be killer next season.
    Sheed does guard Tim better.

    In fact Timmy rapes Ben Wallace one-on-one. But...not every big guy in the league is Tim. And Ben is a top 3 defensive player in the NBA. Not to mention, Sheed is a headcase.

  6. #56
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,450
    Sheed isn't a free agent.

  7. #57
    Veteran Slinkyman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    1,740
    Sheed isn't a free agent.
    He's not but we'd have to trade with Detroit to get Ben because we're not signing him for the MLE, so my thought is if we're going that route i'd rather have Sheed then Ben. It's pure fantasy of course but so is ben wallace on the spurs, i just feel Sheed is the better fit and would complement Tim with his outside shooting.

  8. #58

    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    3,999
    I wouldn't take Sheed over Ben Wallace.

    I love Rasheed's game. He's a very unerrated defender, and his offensive game is comparable to a Dirk Nowitzki. That said, he's a headcase. With him and Timmy on the floor at the same time, you'd need a mop to clean up all the whine drops.

  9. #59
    Get It Sparked Up SPARKY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    5,172
    Hey, we're not getting Ben Wallace. The starting center next season will be Lithuanian or, um, Slovenian. Not Alabamian.

  10. #60

    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    3,999
    Hey, we're not getting Ben Wallace. The starting center next season will be Lithuanian or, um, Slovenian. Not Alabamian.
    Listen, guy.

    It's the middle of summer and we're not playing anymore. I'll be damned if you don't let me ramble about that will probably never happen.

  11. #61
    Spurs Sage Russ's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    9,565
    Would Wallace have played against Dallas?

  12. #62
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    We should totally get Elton Brand.

  13. #63
    Get It Sparked Up SPARKY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    5,172
    Would Wallace have played against Dallas?
    That's the other aspect of this discussion I'm not following. How does Wallace enable the Spurs to play "small ball"? Aren't we on the hunt for an athletic big who can play the 4, run the floor, and rebound no matter the pace?

    Aren't we?

  14. #64
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,450
    That's the other aspect of this discussion I'm not following. How does Wallace enable the Spurs to play "small ball"? Aren't we on the hunt for an athletic big who can play the 4, run the floor, and rebound no matter the pace?

    Aren't we?
    I doubt it. We wouldn't have gone small if Pop remotely trusted his centers.

    But how would Ben not fit that description?

  15. #65
    Get It Sparked Up SPARKY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    5,172
    I think Pop trusts Radoslav to do what he's told, for the most part. Pop didn't go with his centers because that ultimately requires TD to guard Nowitzki.

  16. #66
    Senior Member mike detroit's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    597
    I don't doubt that Wallace might try his luck elsewhere next season but SA? I hope you like games that look like big ten wisconsin performances.

  17. #67
    Spurs Sage Russ's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    9,565
    I don't doubt that Wallace might try his luck elsewhere next season but SA? I hope you like games that look like big ten wisconsin performances.
    True, Ben seems like more of an Eastern Conference performer. I'm afraid the Eastern Conference is becoming a bit of a dinosaur in terms of NBA le-winning potential. Sorry Shaq, Rasheed, Chaucey, Zo, Kidd and Riles.

  18. #68
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    True, Ben seems like more of an Eastern Conference performer. I'm afraid the Eastern Conference is becoming a bit of a dinosaur in terms of NBA le-winning potential. Sorry Shaq, Rasheed, Chaucey, Zo, Kidd and Riles.
    It's not so much a dinosaur as a mayfly.

  19. #69

    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    3,999
    That's the other aspect of this discussion I'm not following. How does Wallace enable the Spurs to play "small ball"? Aren't we on the hunt for an athletic big who can play the 4, run the floor, and rebound no matter the pace?

    Aren't we?
    We're in the hunt for an athletic perimeter guy b/c we don't have a big we can keep on the court.

    Wallace is a capable big. If we had him, we wouldn't be going small-ball. Not the whole ing game anyways.

  20. #70
    Celtic Nation NBA Junkie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,805
    Plus, isn't KG trying to get OUT of Minny?
    No! That's the media's spin on this whole situation.

    KG is frustrated and he has every right to be. Kevin McHale has done an awful job as the GM. But, never once has Garnett come out and publicly demanded a trade. He loves Minnesota and would prefer to spend the rest of his career here. He's not going anywhere-yet!

    At this point, McHale has to go for broke and see if he can make a deal for Iverson. Like I said, such a move could rejuvenate both players and give their respective careers the shot in the arm it desperately needs. Such a move would surely meet Garnett's approval and should be enough to convince him that owner Glen Taylor is serious about putting a winning team on the floor. Could they win a le together? Highly unlikely as the West is packed, but I will say this, it would get fannies back in the seats at Target Center where attendance has been lagging and rightfully so.

    , if it winds up being a failed experiment after two years, fine. Then and only then should management blow up the team and start from scratch. But, the effort has to be made to get a second star player in here or the Wolves go nowhere.

  21. #71
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    No! That's the media's spin on this whole situation.

    KG is frustrated and he has every right to be. Kevin McHale has done an awful job as the GM. But, never once has Garnett come out and publicly demanded a trade. He loves Minnesota and would prefer to spend the rest of his career here. He's not going anywhere-yet!

    At this point, McHale has to go for broke and see if he can make a deal for Iverson. Like I said, such a move could rejuvenate both players and give their respective careers the shot in the arm it desperately needs. Such a move would surely meet Garnett's approval and should be enough to convince him that owner Glen Taylor is serious about putting a winning team on the floor. Could they win a le together? Highly unlikely as the West is packed, but I will say this, it would get fannies back in the seats at Target Center where attendance has been lagging and rightfully so.

    , if it winds up being a failed experiment after two years, fine. Then and only then should management blow up the team and start from scratch. But, the effort has to be made to get a second star player in here or the Wolves go nowhere.
    What they ought to do is fire McHale and find a GM that can actually sign, draft, and trade for players that can play. How badly does the guy have to consistently screw the pooch before he gets replaced? It's like David Stern's real punishment for the Joe Smith deal was forcing you guys to keep McHale or something.

  22. #72
    Oderint dum metuant freedom&justice's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    4,330
    I wouldn't take Sheed over Ben Wallace.

    I love Rasheed's game. He's a very unerrated defender, and his offensive game is comparable to a Dirk Nowitzki. That said, he's a headcase. With him and Timmy on the floor at the same time, you'd need a mop to clean up all the whine drops.
    Ben does quite a bit of whining himself. he doesn't whine as much as Sheed does (no one in the NBA does) but he does whine, and he's had a history of problems with his coaches.

  23. #73
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,450
    All we have to do is tell Ben we'll run some plays for him and he'll sign for the midlevel.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •