That's what I meant to say.
So are the Celtics better than the Bulls if Boston is #7 and Chicago is #4?
Because you like replying to my posts.
That's what I meant to say.
So are the Celtics better than the Bulls if Boston is #7 and Chicago is #4?
It's obviously clear to me that awmyplace is faking it and is screwing with our minds.
Damn, she's already messed with mine.![]()
awmyplace, what about in the West? Do you think the Kings can win the southwest division?
Oh Okay! exactly
Thats a hard question.
And that does it right there. She's a ing idiot. She would have the Sixers make the trade with Philly to swap AI for Iverson.
I gotta stop reading this before I hurt myself laughing.
You're not going to answer my question?I'm dying to know your opinion
![]()
The Spurs will be the first seed next year.The Kings is in the Pacific divison.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I actually agree with awmyre place. Sure the Bulls will be better, but to say they are going to be contenders is quite a stretch.
In case anyone forgot, Ben Wallace has no offensive game what so ever. His weaknesses were hidden by the offensive force of his other four teammates. Do you guys really think the Bulls Deng, Nocioni, Gordon, Heinrich are going to be able to cover Ben's ass? I sure don't.
I agree with you.
No you dumb , I was agreeing with you.
And no need for you to reply, I'll do it for you.
I agree with everything you write. In fact, I've stated ad nauseum in other threads that the Bulls lack of a go-to-guy will be their downfall.
They are contenders- all playoff teams are. They're NOT championship contenders.
Besides, I wanted to get Awmyplace' expert analysis as to why she didn't believe the Bulls were contenders. Do we or do we not hang on her every word?
Finally you agree with me!
They Bulls are contenders.The Bulls are not the same when Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen was playing for the Bulls.
![]()
![]()
![]()
You never cease to amaze!
Gotcha. Contenders yes. Championship contenders no. Their lineup looks very, very solid...........but there is no way they make any sort of run at the le this year. I really didn't like the Wallace pickup for them. He's only got about two to three years left of good quality production........then they are stuck with that nasty ass contract. And who is going to have his back now, he has no Rasheed on D. Is Wallace that much better than Chandler???
First and last sweety.
Thanks!
Chandler was recently traded to New Orleans for JR Smith and PJ Brown.
Brown is a better defender than 'Sheed, but like Wallace, won't provide the Bulls with any scoring punch up front.
Haven't seen much of PJ Brown but I'll take your word for it. Sheed seemed like a great help defender, which allowed Ben to roam, does PJ follow suit?
He's OK at helping out, but is more of a one-on-one defender. He's not a great shot blocker, but doesn't have to be when Ben Wallace is in the line-up.
He's got a good mid-range jumper if he's left open, but Rasheed is the better all-around perimeter shooter in terms of range and can provide inside scoring when he feels like it. Brown is the better offensive rebounder, but that's not surprising since 'Sheed spends a lot of time on the perimeter. They're equal in terms of passing ability and defensive rebounding.
Wow heat 5-1 they should be 8-1 or more no way the win the east next year fluke team.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)