You guys have never registered a homeless person.
Sorry is right. Why would a homeless person put down an address if they were homeless? It doesn't make sense and therefore should obviously be challenged! If one party didn't challenge registered voters who's applications looked fishy, they would be morons for not doing so.
What does that mean, or prove?
They are required to -- it's not a street address, more the general area in which they live.Why would a homeless person put down an address if they were homeless?
Understand?
So, using those criteria, every homeless vote will be challenged.
Could it be that registration information requires a address to be complete?Sorry is right. Why would a homeless person put down an address if they were homeless?
yeah. You guys haven't been homeless like Chumper either.
Then put down a homeless shelter, or a welfare worker or department. Is this what it has come down to? The Dems need the homeless vote to put them over the top? If having an address is the requirement then you should have one. If you want that to change, then write your Congressman. This super finite haggling at the last minute is what causes such foul-ups. Such hee-hawing over very simple principals is absurd. Maybe you can house and feed these people with your words.
Last I heard ChumpDumper had a job.yeah. You guys haven't been homeless like Chumper either.
That's basically what W wants them to eat since he is cutting resources for the poor.Maybe you can house and feed these people with your words.
They do -- just not one mail gets to. If you want that changed, call your congressman.If having an address is the requirement then you should have one.No, I've always been quite fortunate in that regard -- but MB's thinking it's an insult says it all.yeah. You guys haven't been homeless like Chumper either.
That's right. Not all of us can walk on water like you.
Your abstention from penis has made you irritable and argumentative.
All I can do with those is explain to you how that scheme affects them.Maybe you can house and feed these people with your words.
Hey, you can type with your foot in your mouth....That's right. Not all of us can walk on water like you.Ah, the misguided personal attack.Your abstention from penis has made you irritable and argumentative.
My work here is done.
Seriously though, PM Sequ.
Oh, of course you've never engaged in a personal attack in this forum or elsewhere. Never.
It's not misguided to read your drivel and reach the conclusion that you are one angry .
That's ok, you can keep Sequ all to yourself.
Of course I have. But you do it when you've been bested, cupcake. As the banner on the carrier says, "Mission Accomplished."Oh, of course you've never engaged in a personal attack in this forum or elsewhere. Never.Your premise is fundamentally flawed.It's not misguided to read your drivel and reach the conclusion that you are one angry .
BTW, what's your excuse for being an angry ?
I do it whenever I feel like it. "Bested"? You wish.
I don't need an excuse, as I'm not one. What's your excuse for being a weirdo?
I'm not one.
Bested again, I see.
Too bad for you, angry .
Oh yes, it's quite normal to do what you have done.
Bested by who? You?
Ha.
Ha ha.
Cute, yet pathetic. 'tis your history.
Yes, take the high road and call me homeless again.
Isn't this what PMs are for?
Maybe I should take your road. But then I would have to start digging.
If this doesn't make it to the classic threads, nothing will.
Priceless...
Probably should have. Decades later it is still the official policy of the Republican party.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
