Reply With Quote
Thats pretty obvious!If you can't be sop ric from time to time, is life really worth living?
Thats pretty obvious!
Thats pretty obvious!
Brodels said it best. I will only add that if you look at a number of the so-called "great presidents" of the 20th century who won a second term they did not exactly win overwhelmingly and the opposition wasn't that great.
Again, I have provided examples of presidents who won a second term with a significant popular vote margin yet weren't exactly regarded as great presidents.
I would think by now it is clear that popular vote outcomes mean very little in assessing the performance of a president.
As for whether or not Bush is the preferred choice, I think he is based first and foremost on his strategy for dealing with the crazy ing Islamofascist terrorists who want to kill us. It's a controversial policy, hence the closeness of the election. Yet that closeness means very little with regards to whether or not it's the correct policy. Think about what the average man on the street knows about diplomacy and national security strategy. Counting on them to render an accurate assessment is a bit much.
I'm not a democrat either...great job assuming.
Sure you are. I say so.
And....mate!
Actually, I've seen Duff proclaim himself as a Communist in here before, which I find highly amusing since I believe Communists force the state religion on you and we all know how much Duff enjoys religion.
Actually, 'ol Duff can't tell you why he is for someone or something, but he sure can tell you why he is against it. "It's fashionable".
Actually, I don't care one whit about Duff...I'm just having some fun.
"The explosives that shrub/rummy/cia lost were not weaponized or munitions, just (very powerful) explosives, tied down/locked up by the inspectors/sanctions for 10 years, ie, effectively safe from enemy hands.
In that state, they represented no threat to anybody, esp not the "immediate threat to USA" that shrub lied about, esp no threat as compared to the real and immediate terrorist enemies outside of Iraq. Saddam couldn't deliver Scuds to Isreal with any effect in 1991, how was he to weaponize and deliver these explosives in 2003 against the USA 1000's of KM distant?
Now that shrub let the explosives get into enemy hands as part of his bogus war that disrupted the static, effective debilitation of Iraq, the explosives are now being weaponized, and used to kill Americans and Iraqis in Iraq, and very probably exported to the entire terrorist networks.
The big boom of the cartoon in this thread is reallly 1000's of little booms in Iraq, and the big boom(s) from these lost explosives will be heard for years to come against US embassies, ships, buildings, installations, and allies.
shrub's bogus Iraq war is a recruitment and explosives/munitions-equipping campaign for terrorists inside and outside of Iraq. America and world is absolutely not safer from the bogus Iraq war." ........................Here ya go Duff! I know you visit this thread regularly so I brought this over from another thread. Can you read about "shrub" now?????? Posted by Boutons.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions