Reply With Quote
PAC-10 loses millions if SC doesn't go to a BCS game.
It had to go against the Beaverettes no matter how bad a call it was.
This is a ing farse god damnit, everything went good for USC after that phantom interference call.
Even both ing announcers thought it was against USC if anything.
PAC-10 loses millions if SC doesn't go to a BCS game.
It had to go against the Beaverettes no matter how bad a call it was.
did you all just hear the announcer?
"An incompletion helps usc"
thats how great usc is
Holy !
John Mark Carr is making us proud.
He was out of bounds.
Suck it, Beavers.
Suck it, Trojans.
uSC GREATNESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Buh Bye USC.
Either way USC was nowhere near top 5 this year, but those guys have heart. Smith pulled in 4 games worth of numbers in one game. JohnBull Whiney aside - I give USC tons of credit for staying in and fighting back. That was a good game.
Every day is a good day for Notre Dame...bas s with their BCS rules.
i've always been a huge fan of smith. his consistency is great. i'm upset that his great game went to waste. turnovers have been our problem all year. and it certainly was this game (that and i would have given chauncey the ball on the final 2 pt. - he had no problem on the first one). if we can stop the stupid turnovers, with smith performing like he has when healthy, i'm still hopeful for the rose bowl. and, as i said before the beginning of the season, i would be more than happy with that.
Actually the USC loss hurts Notre Dame. Notre Dame is not going to the national championship game with USC's loss.
I win either way.
I have USC in a 4-team 13pt tease & have them with 3 others that have already covered.
BC O 42, No. Ill +29.5 & VA +13.
If SC loses, I & the nation win as well.
I can't believe I won both ways.
SC was +3 but a tie & I would've lost. Might've happened if Beavs won by a FG.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
