Reply With Quote
And Dirk is underrated.
Ben Wallace is overrated.
And Dirk is underrated.
But the dumbest move of all would be for the Bulls management to bend on that rule for Ben Wallace, and if he's going to cry about this, whose to say he wouldn't cry about something else if that rule were not in place?
And I'll say it again: IT DOESNT MATTER IF HE KNEW ABOUT THE RULE BEFORE SIGNING OR NOT.
His job is to follow the rules set out by the organization and his head coach, Scott Skiles could be fired tomorrow, and by some peoples logic he wouldn't have to listen to any of the rules set out by his new head coach because they weren't in place when he signed his contract, and that idea is utter bull ...
That's almost as stupid as the headband rule.
The best part of all this is that in their home opener, the promotion was Big Ben Afro night, complete with headband. I love you, hypocrisy.
why shouldn't i defend him. the guy made a mistake. it's a ing basketball game, not life or death. and don't give me this "millions of people having to eat any piece of their manager throws their way" crap. ing quit if you don't like your job. people who cry about ball players salaries are whiny es. worry about your own salary. who cares if he's never had a real job in his entire life, and how the do you know that is the truth? you're talking out your ass. you want to call out fans for not posting as themselves, hypocrite? your name is obstructed view. now lick my frog balls.
why has he bounced from team to team? i'll give you a hint, it's not because of his at ude. and what does it matter if he can't hit a free-throw to save his life? last i checked they didn't sign him to hit free-throws. and neither can tim, but no one is calling him out on it (and neither can dirk, when it matters. he chokes on balls). i don't think he has ever said that the headband was more important than winning a game. that's something you've made up, yet again. the headband shouldn't be an issue and he's wrong but does it make him a horrible teamate and player like some of you re s have suggested? no. we as spurs fans would love to have him on our team (sans the contract) as would any -ass maverick fan.
For 60 millon dollars, I would play in a ballerina outfit if it was a rule my employer enforced, he shouldn't be crying about a damn headband.
They didn't sign him to complain about headbands, and disrupt the team chemistry which is causing them to lose games, either. Apparently, him wearing a headband is more important than winning, if he knows it's a rule and he still wears it, causing him to be removed from the game.
The funniest thing is Chandler is currently outplaying him...
Ben tonight vs Chandler:
Ben:
32 minutes 1pt 4rbs 2asts 1blk
Chandler:
31 minutes 2pt 17rbs 1ast 3blk
Even Chris Paul had 11 rbs (to go along w/ 18assists 25points 5steals &7to's)
I'm guessing that you either aren't in a supervisory position or were not successful in one. You obviously don't know how to lead. It's not about you or your ego - it's about the success of the people who depend on you. You obviously don't "get it"
WTF? Ban this .
Michael Richards? That you?
Why don't you make a real argument instead of making assumptions about me and attacking me...
Things seem to be working pretty well for Jerry Sloan even with his no head band rule, I don't hear Derrick Fisher crying about their 14-4 record, and I'd argue that a good leader is someone who will stand by his convictions, what's the point of having rules if you are going to let a spoiled super star get away with not following them?
It is about the succes of the people who depend on you... all of them, not just the "superstar." In this case, as was stated by someone earlier, it is completely reasonable to suggest that willingness to conform to team dress codes creates an atmosphere that puts the team ahead of personal preferences, ultimately leading to more positive outcomes for the team as a whole.
Whether or not that will result in this situation is yet to be seen, but it is not an outlandish policy if considered within that light. So please, don't attack other posters on their leadership ability when an argument can be made that enforcing a dress code uniformly could result in higher levels of "success of the people that depend on you."
Just how is that? And the thing you said about the whole team and not the superstar? How is alienating the superstar over nothing NOT messing up the entire team? It's about Paxon and Skiles' ego here - don't think it's not.
Who was attacking who first? I made a legitimate argument - just because your ass doesn't agree with it doesn't mean it's not legitimate. Your point of view could be wrong. It is possible. Arrogant Ass.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
