I think Portland could be able to throw something together if Allen feels like making his team relevant again.
Chris Webber's 22M comes off the books after next season. They'll probably want young players and draft picks more.
I imagine that Cuban isn't being so stingy in his talks with Billy King.
I think Portland could be able to throw something together if Allen feels like making his team relevant again.
Cuban said preliminarily that he wouldn't give up Harris, who is honestly the only developmental player the Sixers would want. That means he'd have to give up a guy like Terry.
Terry + Diop + (other sub-5mil player) would do it...
Honestly though, I'd put the odds of it happening at far less than a couple other teams...
AI for Randolph and a #1, but I doubt it'll happen.
Nah, Magloire and some young dudes and picks for AI and a couple of minimum big guys.
Problem is Magliore only makes about $8 mil. That's only about half of what is needed to make the deal work. It'd have to be Magliore plus about 4 rookie contracts to make that deal work...not gonna happen.
EDIT: Unless they're under the salary cap?
4-TEAM TRADE
HAWKS RECEIVE:
RONNIE PRICE
NENAD KRSTIC
JEFF McINNIS
LOUIS WILLIAMS
1st Round Pick from Nets
2nd Round Pick from 76ERS
1st Round Pick from Kings
NETS RECEIVE:
KYLE KORVER
CHRIS WEBBER
FRANCISCO GARCIA
SALIM STOUDAMIRE
ZAZA PACHULIA
76ERS RECEIVE:
MIKE BIBBY
SHAREEF ABDUR-RAHIM
VINCE CARTER
JASON COLLINS
MARVIN WILLIAMS
KINGS RECEIVE:
ALLEN IVERSON
STEVEN HUNTER
SOLOMON JONES
1st Round Pick from 76ERS
Don't know if this will work out chemistry-wise, but I was just ing around at ESPN Trade Machine and I came upon this. And I do know the odds of this are 1,000,000/1.
AI will go to Denver and nowhere else.
My sources indicate that this trade is very unlikely.
Chris Webber is a true untradeable I think. Why would the Nets want him, especially if they had to give up VC?
Bearup has said JR wont be in any trade for AI. If the Nuggets get AI it won't include JR.
Magloire and a couple of young guys who make $2.5 to $3 million would do it.
exactly. we already have a young team chemistry.
Cuban's not that dumb. they would want a lot of our younger players. better not happen
The talk among some Mavs employees tonight was that Devin is being considered in a trade. They may have just been referencing this column, but that was the word.
harris is much less than martin, no matter what. i'm a big harris fan, but the mav's need to be careful where they move him. they don't want devin to come back around and bite them on their ass. i want to see harris succeed.
I could see Iverson with Indianapolis ; nothing is working for the Pacers
Memphis is interesting too ; trade Eddie Jones+Damon for Iverson
Last edited by lefty; 12-10-2006 at 05:59 AM.
indy for who? who goes? o'neal is near untouchable, who know's what could happen.
i agree, memphis could be very interesting in playing out. love to get eddie or damon in a kings uni.
I'd like to think that Cuban learned his lesson after the Jamison/Walker trades killed the chemistry of the Mavs in '04.
That said, I'd love to see Iverson on the Mavs. He would ruin everything they had going there.
yessssssssssss
Why is O'Neal untouchable? He's injury-prone, obviously no more a "franchise player" than Iverson is, and has never justified his enormous salary.
Quite frankly he's one of the most overrated players in the NBA today.
Tinsley+O'Neal for Iverson+Dalembert would seem an even trade that could benefit both teams.
Tinsley-----------Iverson
Iguodala---------Jackson
Korver-----------Granger
Webber----------Harrington
O'Neal-----------Dalembert
Why would the Sixers want two injury-prone overrated PFs on their team (O'Neal and Webber)? I guess they'd be giving up the hasn't-lived-up-to-his-potential-yet Dalembert.
Equivocating between O'Neal's frequent minor bumps and overuse injuries and Webber's permanent complete lack of athleticism isn't really fair.
They would want O'Neal because he's the best deal they could get - and if they could unload If-I-only-had-a-brain Dalembert's contract at the same time, they would jump at the chance.
I still don't know if Larry Bird would even want that deal - if they could get rid of Stephen Jackson, then I would even make that trade.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)