Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 61 of 61
  1. #51
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906


    Yeah, I didn't understand the flares picture either.

    Oohhhhh, pretty lights.

    edit out the flares, if they hinder the point one's trying to make.

  2. #52
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    THat's the thing, Bush actually took out the terrorist.

    Clinton just wagged the dog per say, and bombed sand.

  3. #53
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    Right. it's so ing ridiculous. When Bush took out a terraist in the Pakistan frontier using a missle fired from a remote control plane, he was obviously being a pussy right?

    Idiots.

    Well he did at least take out the terrorist, did he?

    You said it.

    Unless you're laughing at your own , you got me.

  4. #54
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    It's per se, and again, it's alot easier to take out terrorists with flyover permission, ground assistance in targeting and land bases of operation a few miles away.

  5. #55
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    It's per se, and again, it's alot easier to take out terrorists with flyover permission, ground assistance in targeting and land bases of operation a few miles away.

    You're right, the mission is easier.

    But the responsibility and repurcussions of the political fallout are not, and that's where Bush and CLinton, to me, differ.

    Nothing funny about that.

  6. #56
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    But the responsibility and repurcussions of the political fallout are not, and that's where Bush and CLinton, to me, differ.
    What's the difference?

  7. #57
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    What's the difference?
    Are you serious?


    Very,

    One eliminates terrorist, the other one had the chance to and didn't.

    I know you'll bring up tora bora, but bush didn't have him in custody or had a precision attack to Osama available.

  8. #58
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    But you just agreed with the argument that cruise missles aren't precise.

    Which is it?

  9. #59
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    Post?

  10. #60
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,406
    So your contention is that cruise missle strikes are as precise and reliable as ground-directed Predator drone and AC130 attacks?

  11. #61
    Believe. gtownspur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    3,906
    So your contention is that cruise missle strikes are as precise and reliable as ground-directed Predator drone and AC130 attacks?

    That has nothing to do with my point.


    I'm ignorant on the technical aspects of military warfare, i'm talking about the political aspect.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •