Reply With Quote
Aw, don't get mad fellow internet peon.
It's all better now.
Boxer says these things for a reason. She knows that flinging poo draws shrieks of delight from the chimps on the far left.
Aw, don't get mad fellow internet peon.
It's all better now.
Methinks you are looking in a mirror if you see someone who is angry.
I apologize, your response wasn't glib, but full of substance.
All this ing about someone being a moderator. funny.
What is breathtaking is how thin skinned wingnuts are. Boxer spoke the truth. She made no judgements about whether Rice should or should not have children, that is a straw man the wing nuts threw together so they could get in a huff and play victim again.
Read Boxer's statment again. Nothing there to get upset about unless you want to manufacture something.
Now that the wingnuts are in the minority again in the Congress, they are getting back to what they do best........
Cry and pout and play the victim. Find something real to be outraged about AHF, like say an able bodied service age A&M graduate advocating war and the need for military intervention while snuggled safe and sound in their warm home stateside banging away on their keyboard.
Horse hockey! Boxer was doing what dimm-o-craps always do. Attack the
people they disagree with on a personal basis. And she especially dislikes
Rice since she is black and a Republican. In Boxer's mind the two
do not mix (black and Republican). And shouldn't happen.
And Rice didn't play the victim in any sense. She threw it back into
Boxer's face.
Ray your really reaching now..
]Horse hockey! Boxer was doing what dimm-o-craps always do. Attack the
people they disagree with on a personal basis.
Gee I don't remember anyone on the right defending RIchard Clarke's and Paul O'Neil's books which were very critical of Bush...? Yet all we heard from the GOP apologists is that these guys were bitter, they had an axe to grind.. they had agendas..etc..
nevermind the first person accounts of what they wrote about..
Ray for the lst 6 yr s the GOP has perfected attacking the messenger.. do you need anymore examples?
You know why all of this seems familiar?
Because both of the parties do it! Spend most of their time in office getting ready to be re-elected, cursing the other party as being polarizing and how much better this country would be if the minority party was in control, and help out the special insterests in their own distrcits.
Long live the special interest financed 2 party system!!!!
Boxer's statement, while not the personal attack some would like it to be interpreted as, was an irrelevant appeal to emotion. It's a dumbed-down argument for dumbed-down people.
Not to be outdone in the useless, miss-the-point-completely hyperbole compe ion, Rush Limbaugh accused Boxer of trying to "lynch" Rice.
"Rush Limbaugh accused Boxer of trying to "lynch" Rice."
Seems like this asshole can't smell a fart without trying to inflame it. He knows how to talk to his sheeple and rabble.
what's that? crying and making excuses of why they lost the elections and crying conspiracy?
No, but dems and repugs are all the same.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions