Reply With Quote
Dude, I'm supposed to take something hosted on this guy's website seriously?
Ok now, life in Iraq before the first Gulf War and years of U.S. led embargo....
Iraq 1990
Dude, I'm supposed to take something hosted on this guy's website seriously?
Kiss my ass...I've never acted macho or tried to pass myself off as some kind of tough guy on this site...suck wad. Although I have gotten some death threats from a few of you peace loving libbies...
You aren't on ignore because of any weakness on my part...you are on ignore because you suck s.
Is NBADan on my ignore? No he isn't, have I ever put Chump on ignore(even pre-mod), uh no I haven't...and I've gotten into more arguments with Chump than anyone...
IT's not that I am pussy, it's that you suck... s.
Whatt is whottt arguing for anyways? Can't we all just agree to disagree? Okay, I admit it, Team America was a movie about how we should be the World's Police. My bad. This makes me want to bump that thread whottt made about how Team America was the Modern Marriott Neocon's comedy, and it obliterated the left, proving the right to be far superior.
wow. quote of the year.
Hogwash...it's just that the left never gets lampooned in cinema...it's always the right, the fact that Team America parodied the left was a novelty, a unique and rare treat...and the celebrity bashing was oh so accurate. Bump away...LaMarcus.
And the point of arguing is because the stupid need to know they are stupid...it's not like the forum is over run with moderates, it's pretty much been reduced to a hysterical leftist circle jerk...with the occassional appearance by a moderate or righty.
The funniest thing is I am not a right winger by any definition except maybe on the death penatly and foreign policy in the midle east...I didn't vote for Bush in 00, in fact I couldn't stand him and still can't...but at least he had the single redeeming quality that he didn't give a who liked him(he since lost that), which was more than any redeeming qualities Kerry had.
It does not good to protest this war, now, we are in it...unless you truly believe we should just cut and run because we can't take the heat and let the chips fall where they may...which would be an incredily bad idea.
If it goes to Civil war then ok...but until that time finish it.
And period...until those despots get removed from power terrorism will continue to be a problem.
Last edited by whottt; 01-29-2007 at 05:36 PM.
Your 2nd cowardly dodge was again noted.
Note away...then go look at Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf on the map.
Then , put 2 and 2 together and realize that I asked you to look at those locations because of where they lie in relation to Iran...not because I thought you were talking about Afghanistan.
Get it?
I know, I know...Sarcasm.
You made specific references to our airstrike capabilities, I demonstrated them to you. 3rd cowardly dodge.
Idiot. Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf border Iran, you wit, that was why I asked you to look them up, not because I thought you were talking about invading Afghanistan.
See the Pretty Map?
First, I posted:
then in response, you postedThis is by far the most re ing thing you've ever posted. How does having military forces bogged down in a hostile nation help us strategically? So we're "that much closer to invading Iran?" We don't even have enough troops to secure Iraq. "So we can bomb the out of Iran if they so much as flinch!"...we can do that from carriers in the gulf and air bases in Turkey.
I demonstrated that we can, in fact, bomb Iran (and Afghanistan) from Turkey (we have airbases in S.A. as well) or from carriers in the gulf. Your off-tangent psychorant about looking up Afganistan on a map has nothing to do with my original statement. Yes, Afghanistan borders Iran. That has precisely to do with keeping forces in IRAQ.
You're like a ty poker player who keeps bluffing through a hand after the flop.
Idiot...we can also now launch airstrikes from our bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. Do you consider that a negative? Idiot?
Being able to attack Iran from all sides>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than not.
And we have near carte blanche to do so(albeit not as much as we'd hoped fro in Iraq).
Now we don't have to kiss turkish ass, or tiptoe around Pakistan.
Look at the map please...then shut up.
All an act to deflect attention away from your cowardice shottt, but keep it up.
It's for posterity
But we don't need Iraq or Afgahnistan to lauch airstrikes at Iran. Carriers don't need any country's permission. The only reason it would be helpful to "attack from all sides" using Iraq and Afghanistan would be if we planned on doing more than airstrikes...such as invading with ground troops. Like I said earlier, we don't even have enough to secure Iraq.
Good god you are a tactical idiot...
I'm just ing speechless.
It's almost as bad as having to teach you english while I am arguing with you.
Goddammit Pix, don't you understand our motive is to invade Iran so we can have a clear path to the Caspian Sea. Go suck some you iranian lover!!!!!!!
Whott needs to take another look at his map. Anbar province, where most of the Iraq resistance is center, is 1/3 the size of Iraq. Now look at the size of Iran and imagine the whole country as one big anbar province with the Persian Gulf, the life-line to industrialized society as we know it, on one side.
I finally get it...I never thought you guys were true liberals...too much hypochracy. I was right, you aren't.
You really are completely utter and total tactical idiots...
At last I understand.
Nbadan...I am well aware of the issues in Iraq, safe to assume that it was hoped the internal military forces would be stronger by now than they are, that doesn't change the fact that for purposes of war with Iran were in 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 times better position to knock out any nuclear facilities than we were prior to invading Iraq and if you can't see that...I'm sorry, it's because you are stupid, not because I am wrong.
We are also in position to economically strangle Iran....something Saudi and Pakistan will be only be too happy to help us do.
The funniest thing is watching you guys act like Iran is the military juggernaut...newsflash, Iraq kicked the out of Iran in their war...it took us about 5 seconds to obliterate that same Iraqi military without a single boot setting foot on the ground.
I agree about team america whottt, but i still don't see how your anger at cut and running applies to iran....
LaMarcus...check your PM please.
It is of the utmost urgency and far more important than trivial arguments on the political forum.
Thanks in advance.
If you're trying to pass yourself off as someone who's infinitely superior in military knowledge to "tactical idiots" like me for daring to suggest we can reach Iranian airspace from carriers in the gulf and air bases throughout the M.E. other than Iraq and Afghanistan, you might want to avoid such ignorant and false statements like the one you just made above.
To your other point, yes we can take on the Iranian military, but that's not the problem...the problem is trying to occupy yet another country hostile to our prescence there.
The guy that has half the people on this board on his ignore list is calling someone a "chicken- wimp" for having him on ignore..........priceles..
Boutons, you truly are a huge bag.
Whott's lack of understanding in assymetrical warfare prevents him from seeing the forest from the trees. Yes, we could cripple Iran economically, and they could cripple the rest of the world economically.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
