Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 62 of 62
  1. #51
    Finals MVP GINNNNNNNNNNNNOBILI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    2,996
    Ask Horry... He'd give up all his championships to have Karl Malones career

  2. #52
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Trading TWO All-star calibre guards for one frontline player means that guy has to be a Championship maker all on his own for years because it would take a long time to replace two top guards.
    Well said...

    Current combined production is roughly 35ppg, 8rpg, 8apg, and 3spg.

    Most comparable to those stats is Dwayne Wade @ 28.8ppg, 5rpg, 7.9apg, and 2.15spg.

    So even if Dwayne Wade was offered up (not a chance in ) it wouldn't be statistically prudent to do that deal. And the question your asking is if I'd give up those two for a CHANCE at a guy like Oden or Durant, who MIGHT be as dominant...the answer for me is easily NO.

    BTW, of the two I'd take Durant. He could lead the league in scoring, be top 5 in rebounding, and top 10 in blocks & steals. He's rediculously good.

  3. #53
    Finals MVP GINNNNNNNNNNNNOBILI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    2,996
    Well said...

    Current combined production is roughly 35ppg, 8rpg, 8apg, and 3spg.

    Most comparable to those stats is Dwayne Wade @ 28.8ppg, 5rpg, 7.9apg, and 2.15spg.

    So even if Dwayne Wade was offered up (not a chance in ) it wouldn't be statistically prudent to do that deal. And the question your asking is if I'd give up those two for a CHANCE at a guy like Oden or Durant, who MIGHT be as dominant...the answer for me is easily NO.

    BTW, of the two I'd take Durant. He could lead the league in scoring, be top 5 in rebounding, and top 10 in blocks & steals. He's rediculously good.

    Actually, if you are going by that theory, Add in Brent Barry's 10/3/3 (in limited minutes) and it averages out to 39/8/11 and would be statistically prudent to make the trade

  4. #54
    Horny Spur BeerIsGood!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    4,228
    If he went to college 4 years, he would have been guaranteed a le or come close?

    He's a wasted talent because he hasn't won a le?

    I don't follow the logic.

    And I don't think he is greedy. He gives an incredible amount of money to charity.
    Guaranteed a le after 4 years of college - no. Had a better chance of a le if his outrageous contract didn't handicap his team? Yes.

    Not only has he not won a le, but his teams are an embarrasment. Only a few decent seasons peaking with a WCF appearance. Other than that his talent has been wasted on horrible teams. I'm not saying that it's his fault, but the size of the contract does negatively impact the team's cap - so it's loosely like trading money for success.

    I personally like the guy he's become as he matured during his career. Very outspoken, but seems like a genuinely nice and caring person. Greediness was a bad choice of words on my part.

    Call me crazy, but I would take $85 million dollars and three championships over $165 million and nothing to show for it. ANYTHING is bad in excess, and money is no different. $85 million is excess enough for me - even at that figure I'd have to be creative in how I dispersed the money to keep from being corrupted by it.

  5. #55
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    Guaranteed a le after 4 years of college - no. Had a better chance of a le if his outrageous contract didn't handicap his team? Yes.

    Not only has he not won a le, but his teams are an embarrasment. Only a few decent seasons peaking with a WCF appearance. Other than that his talent has been wasted on horrible teams. I'm not saying that it's his fault, but the size of the contract does negatively impact the team's cap - so it's loosely like trading money for success.

    I personally like the guy he's become as he matured during his career. Very outspoken, but seems like a genuinely nice and caring person. Greediness was a bad choice of words on my part.

    Call me crazy, but I would take $85 million dollars and three championships over $165 million and nothing to show for it. ANYTHING is bad in excess, and money is no different. $85 million is excess enough for me - even at that figure I'd have to be creative in how I dispersed the money to keep from being corrupted by it.
    Well it's not like he went to the NBA because he was greedy and knew that the salary structure was going to change soon and be lower, right? It's not like he could have said, "Hmm.. maybe if I wait a couple years and don't go to the NBA now, then the salary rules will change and give my team some more flexibility". That's why I didn't get you calling him greedy. So I'm glad you re-phrased it.

    Not only has he not won a le, but his teams are an embarrasment. Only a few decent seasons peaking with a WCF appearance. Other than that his talent has been wasted on horrible teams
    They went to the playoffs eight/nine straight years, right?
    So you can't really call his teams an embarrassment. Embarrassments are bottom of the barrel teams, not playoff teams.

  6. #56
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Actually, if you are going by that theory, Add in Brent Barry's 10/3/3 (in limited minutes) and it averages out to 39/8/11 and would be statistically prudent to make the trade
    You're adding a value that already exists in the pre-existing team, so it cancels out. If you're assuming that he doubles his production with increased minutes, then you can add those #'s, but if not...it all comes out in the wash.

    I was saying from a purely statistical standpoint, it's not feasible to do. There are several other peripheral reasons why it's not feasible.

  7. #57
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868

    They went to the playoffs eight/nine straight years, right?
    So you can't really call his teams an embarrassment. Embarrassments are bottom of the barrel teams, not playoff teams.
    Any team with a talent like Kevin Garnett that is not a perennial contender is an embarrassment.

    Having said that, the onus is on the T-Wolves front office for not making the right personnel decisions to surround Garnett with the right players. Letting Cassell/Sprewell go, giving huge contracts to defensive specialists and backup PGs, and failing to draft anyone of note (though 2006 seems successful) have made this team what it is--a fringe lottery team with little opportunity to improve, but with less opportunity to tank the season. It's just a sad situation all-around.

  8. #58
    Horny Spur BeerIsGood!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    4,228

    They went to the playoffs eight/nine straight years, right?
    So you can't really call his teams an embarrassment. Embarrassments are bottom of the barrel teams, not playoff teams.
    It's not like we're talking baseball here where only the elite teams make the playoffs. In a league where 1/2 of the teams make the playoffs - making the playoffs isn't that great of an accomplishment. If a team has a superstar and either barely makes the playoffs or now doesn't make them at all - that's an embarrasment.

  9. #59
    Horny Spur BeerIsGood!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    4,228
    Well it's not like he went to the NBA because he was greedy and knew that the salary structure was going to change soon and be lower, right? It's not like he could have said, "Hmm.. maybe if I wait a couple years and don't go to the NBA now, then the salary rules will change and give my team some more flexibility". That's why I didn't get you calling him greedy. So I'm glad you re-phrased it.


    Regarding the salary, he could have been working with the FO on a plan if he were to restructure his salary. Many people in other sports have done so (Troy Aikman) in their quest for success, but it obviously wasn't that important to him.


    (I am not aware of anything in the CBA back in the late 90's that would have prevented him from doing so, but if there was disregard this statement).

  10. #60
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Regarding the salary, he could have been working with the FO on a plan if he were to restructure his salary. Many people in other sports have done so (Troy Aikman) in their quest for success, but it obviously wasn't that important to him.


    (I am not aware of anything in the CBA back in the late 90's that would have prevented him from doing so, but if there was disregard this statement).
    I think the only thing he can do is exercise an opt-out if he has a player option in the last year or two of his deal and work an entirely new contract. Of course, there are risks with opt-outs like the player joining another team (see: Carlos Boozer and Cavs). Why opt out to take less money and put trust in the T-Wolves when he couldjust as easily join a legit championship contender (Spurs?) for the mid-level exception (a la Karl Malone)?


    Bottom Line: While his cost against the cap would be tough to overcome when searching for sidekicks, it's not impossible. It's on the Minnesota front office to make the personnel moves. They offered him $126M, what was he supposed to do...turn it down?

  11. #61
    2nd Verse Same as the 1st Oh, Gee!!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    8,869
    for D-Wade

  12. #62
    Believe. BLACKMAMBA24's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Post Count
    101
    D-Whistle

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •