Dynasties never last for long

[dbreiden83080]

Can the spurs be considered a dynasty?

They are not a dynasty but they are a near dynasty if you ask me. With all the whining that Spurs fans do about this year, if they never win another le in 20 years you will look back and say in the Duncan Era they won 3 les in a span of 7 years. How many teams in the history of pro sports can honestly say that, not too many.

[dbreiden83080]

3 IN a ROW. It's called defending a le. Something the SPURS have never done. TOO SOFT.

Your team was so much better than anything the Spurs have ever had and they still won 3 total les.

[jeffdrums22]

NBA Dynasties

Minneapolis Lakers of the 1950s (5 championships between 1949 and 1954)

Boston Celtics (1956 to 1986 16 NBA les in 30 years overall. 26 winning seasons, 20 division les, 18 conference les)

Los Angeles Lakers of 1979 to 1991 (5 NBA championships, 10 division les, 9 conference championships, 12 winning seasons)

Chicago Bulls of the 1990s (6 championships in 8 seasons)

Los Angeles Lakers 1999- 2004 (3 NBA championships, 3 division les, 4 NBA Finals appearances, 5 playoff appearances)

LAKER DOMINATION ES

Sorry, but I don't count teams that win multiple championships in a league of only 13 or so teams (1960s was it?) a real dynasty. Whenever the era of 25 or so teams started (late 70s, 80s? I don't know) that's when you can start talking about real dynasties.