Originally Posted by Fox News![]()
Which tower directly collapsed on WTC7 again?
Originally Posted by Fox News![]()
The quote from from CalTrans, you idiot.
Did you see the falling concrete crumble into millions of pieces too?(ofcourse that is so relevent and shouldnt the bottom level have been pancaked by the weight of the second level falling on it?) dripping with sarcasm[/U]
![]()
How hot did the WTC fires get again?
Waitin on the answer to this gem...
It wouldn't have taken as much termite, or other extremely hot burning material, as you might think. I've seen estimates of a 3" wide layer of thermite either sprayed or applied to steel beams would have been sufficient.Since they contend the steel MELTED, you are talking enough thermite to melt a LOT of steel.
Hot enough to affect the structural integrity, I would imagine.
Hot enough to affect the structural integrity of basement floors?
Did you know that a 47-story building weighs more than a 9-story building?
How many man hours would this have taken?
Oh, I see, you already have your mind made up, we shouldn't confuse you with facts or evidence.
Tell me then, a rough approximation, how much per column would it have taken?
1 pound?
10?
20?
Nah, that's too high...I'll have a looksy for the article..
How would this thermite have been kept in place instead of running down the column when it started burning?
Let's not forget the unprecedented power-downs and reports of strange workers in both towers prior to 911.
You didn't answer my question.
How many labor hours?
It would be so much easier to disprove all the 911 complication had all the evidence not been recycled or pressed into commemarative coins in such a rushed manner..
NIST researchers estimated that at least 0.13 pounds of thermite would be required to heat each pound of a steel section to approximately 700 degrees Celsius
Melting point of steel 2000 degrees
.13*2000/700=.37 pounds of thermite per pound of steel to melt steel.
1 pound of steel is 1.5 cubic inches.
so this would be 1 pound of thermite per 4 square inches of steel assuming that one applied that in a 1 inch band laterally, and only melted the first cubic inch. (I assume the column is more than an inch thick, so this would not be sufficient to melt all the way through)
It would then be a simple matter to measure around the column with a tape measure say at least 3, maybe 5 feet in cir fence?
Five feet divided by 4 inches would yield 15 pounds of thermite per column, just to melt a ring of one cubic inch and not all the way through.
if the column is further around, it is more, if the column is thicker than an inch, it is more.
15*47 columns=705 pounds per floor
705 pounds per floor times 100 floors=77550 pounds per building
times two buildings =77.55 TONS of thermite AT A MINIMUM.
Tell me again where the invoice for all this is?
Surely that much thermite would be a MAJOR order for the company that made it.
Find that invoice, and you convince me.![]()
the amount of burn down would be dependent on the amount of thermite applied and the angle and method of application. It's more likely thermite would be used to weaken the steel, much like your theory on fire.
ofcourse you cant post link to the alleged photos
thermite would pull into liquid metal....
Shortly after this, the liquid iron flows into the mold around the rail gap.
Remember my calculations provide a very minimal figure, so you are still talking something on the order of a hundred tons to realistically be able to do what you say happened.
There were a few reports of "odd" work crews, but if there were guys constantly going in and out of EVERY floor, surely that would have been remarked on a bit more than it was by survivors, wouldn't it?
There is no "angle" for a vertical column.
If that layer of crap was everywhere it would have taken one small crew MONTHS to wire the buildings in the manner you describe. Say 10 minutes per column*47*110*2=103400 minutes= <b>43 solid days of 8 hour work for a five man team.</b>
TIMES TWO.
IF no one really noticed the stuff sticking to the columns with detonators attached to it in that month.
This never pans out when you actually think about what would have been involved.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)