Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 243
  1. #51
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,879
    it didn't occur in a tunnel or hallway, it was on the court. Which is where the wiggle room is gone.

  2. #52
    Clever got me this far... JMarkJohns's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    10,116
    Actually the rule has been amended from the Ewing suspension. There's wiggle room for the league. I say don't suspend anybody, even Horry, and let 'em play.
    Horry, at least, should get one game for his forearm to Bell's head.

    Still, I'll take no suspensions. It'll be the best business and basketball decision and no team would fault them for doing it.

  3. #53
    If you can't slam with the best then jam with the rest sabar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,628
    This wasn't an unusual situation, it was a generic flagrant foul and everyone-goes-to-the-altercation.

  4. #54
    Believe.
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    250
    obviously this was not in a hallway or tunnel but it was an unusual situation where the league will determine the appropriate solution.

    I think Big Shot Rob is gone and Suns are at full strength.

  5. #55
    Believe. Kevin Blackistone's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    544
    Dude, you are such a weasel. Grow a spine. Your posts consistently take opposite positions. Your posts are a complete waste of time.
    What opposite positions? I've said that rules are rules, and you have to uphold them if you want any kind of order. Therefore, many suspensions are warranted because of NBA rules.

    Or, I said they could just let things go from now on and not suspend anyone. Not Horry, not Amare, and not the next person that checks someone into the table or elbows someone in the nose.

    Learn to read ass. I've had one position the entire time.

    oh, I forgot... go yourself.

  6. #56
    Believe. UV Ray's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    828
    It certainly isn't an automatic suspension. There is some gray area.



    http://espn.go.com/nba/news/2002/1028/1452258.html
    Excellent post. Thanks.

  7. #57
    If you can't slam with the best then jam with the rest sabar's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,628
    Oh yeah, I'm also getting sick of refs not calling obvious intentional fouls. The players in the playoffs have been going for small stuff like slaps and the refs don't call it, so they have to step up to holds and pushes to get them to whistle it.

  8. #58
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Yup, didn't Najera get suspended even though he was already on the court but was obviously trying to break up the fight?
    Yeah, but they changed the rules to "bench area" after the Patrick Ewing suspension. There's an outside chance Amare walks on this. I'm sure the league was unhappy with Amare about the escalation of the tension in the series by his comments. We'll see if the league takes that into account. If the series is as violent and contentious as he claimed, one might think he'd be mindful of his reactions to situations.

  9. #59
    Believe.
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    250
    it didn't occur in a tunnel or hallway, it was on the court. Which is where the wiggle room is gone.

    Basically the rule isn't just black n white. The league will look at the entire situation. Nothing is gonna happen to Amare or Boris.

  10. #60
    Veteran milkyway21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    10,988
    CBS Sportsline reports:

    Game 5 is Wednesday night in Phoenix and it's possible there could be suspensions from the league for players leaving the bench after Horry fouled Nash.

  11. #61
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    What opposite positions? I've said that rules are rules, and you have to uphold them if you want any kind of order. Therefore, many suspensions are warranted because of NBA rules.

    Or, I said they could just let things go from now on and not suspend anyone. Not Horry, not Amare, and not the next person that checks someone into the table or elbows someone in the nose.

    Learn to read ass. I've had one position the entire time.

    oh, I forgot... go yourself.
    I guess the point is rules and rules, but they are up to interpretation. The league will figure out two things 1) If they believe Amare was on his way to check-in 2) If they don't believe that, if they consider him "in the vicinity" of the bench.

    It's not a hard fast automatic thing that he'll get suspended just because he stepped on the court.

  12. #62
    Believe.
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    250
    CBS Sportsline reports:

    Game 5 is Wednesday night in Phoenix and it's possible there could be suspensions from the league for players leaving the bench after Horry fouled Nash.
    lol thanks Captain Obvious.

  13. #63
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    CBS Sportsline reports:

    Game 5 is Wednesday night in Phoenix and it's possible there could be suspensions from the league for players leaving the bench after Horry fouled Nash.
    Thank you CBS

  14. #64
    Clever got me this far... JMarkJohns's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    10,116
    Plus who steps onto the court to check in,
    It certainly appears that if he was "checking in" his typical sideline path was taken up with coaches and other players. His only real course for such an act was on the court.

    Again, I'm not buying the whole "checking in" alibi. I think it may have occured, but also think Amare may have used it as liberty to see what was what.

  15. #65
    A neverending cycle Trainwreck2100's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,879
    obviously this was not in a hallway or tunnel but it was an unusual situation where the league will determine the appropriate solution.

    I think Big Shot Rob is gone and Suns are at full strength.

    Diaw's gone cause he wasnt checking in, who knows whether stern/jackson will buy the checking in argument, cause that was his only defense

  16. #66
    Unsigned #1 Draft Pick RonMexico's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    4,768
    Stern can always change the rules in the off-season - I'd say he starts right now...

    (please....)

  17. #67
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Horry, at least, should get one game for his forearm to Bell's head.

    Still, I'll take no suspensions. It'll be the best business and basketball decision and no team would fault them for doing it.
    I agree that the closest thing to a slam dunk suspension in my opinion is the Horry contact with Bell, but since Bell was rushing at him, one could make a case that he was just defending himself. Horry is five inches or so taller than Bell and there were a lot of people's hands in there. I don't particularly give a if they suspend Horry, I just thought it might be cool if they just kind of gave everyone a do over so we could all enjoy the rest of the series.

  18. #68
    Believe. Kevin Blackistone's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    544
    Horry, at least, should get one game for his forearm to Bell's head.

    Still, I'll take no suspensions. It'll be the best business and basketball decision and no team would fault them for doing it.
    They all broke rules that warrant a one game suspension. Either suspend all of the violators or suspend no one. Anything else destroys all credibility and turns the NBA into a fixed league with an agenda against certain teams.

    If they choose to not suspend anyone, they better not start suspending people later who cheap shot opponents. If they do, it will take away all credibilty because it means they broke their own rules for this one instance, and this one instance alone.

  19. #69
    Believe.
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    250
    I guess the point is rules and rules, but they are up to interpretation. The league will figure out two things 1) If they believe Amare was on his way to check-in 2) If they don't believe that, if they consider him "in the vicinity" of the bench.

    It's not a hard fast automatic thing that he'll get suspended just because he stepped on the court.
    why would he get suspended just because he stepped on the court? Isn't that rule intended for fights? If you step on the court during a fight. Was that a fight? Guys step on the court constantly during the game. All this speculating and we all know the rules are pretty much up to the interpretation of the league and the situation at hand.

  20. #70
    Stomping on Laker haters Purple & Gold's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    2,922
    That's part of it, but the officials have been letting minor contact go when teams are trying to intentionally foul. It sets the stage for exactly what we saw. Nash is in playoff mode and is reflexively going to sell the contact. If they'd just called Manu for the first one (I don't think he completely whiffed on him) the whole situation could have been prevented.
    That's the problem. It's that selling a foul is now a reflex. If refs continue to buy it then players will continue to flop. It wasn't needed in this instance and will probably end up killing the Suns. If Nash would have took the foul without trying to sell it, they still would have won and all of this would have been avoided. He just chose a bad time to sell the flagrant.

  21. #71
    Believe. UV Ray's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    828
    What opposite positions? I've said that rules are rules, and you have to uphold them if you want any kind of order. Therefore, many suspensions are warranted because of NBA rules.

    Or, I said they could just let things go from now on and not suspend anyone. Not Horry, not Amare, and not the next person that checks someone into the table or elbows someone in the nose.

    Learn to read ass. I've had one position the entire time.

    oh, I forgot... go yourself.

  22. #72
    Unsigned #1 Draft Pick RonMexico's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    4,768
    No doubt that Horry has to be gone... but for how long? Does he get the Raja clothesline 1-gamer? Despite what Blackistone says, I think we might see Bell's tech rescinded because Horry led with the elbow to the neck and Raja hadn't thrown anything yet.

  23. #73
    Five Rings... Kori Ellis's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    64,671
    why would he get suspended just because he stepped on the court? Isn't that rule intended for fights? If you step on the court during a fight. Was that a fight? Guys step on the court constantly during the game. All this speculating and we all know the rules are pretty much up to the interpretation of the league and the situation at hand.
    The rule says during an "altercation" I believe.

    And yes, this would be considered an altercation.



    So it's just a matter of them interpreting "vicinity" in regards to Amare.

  24. #74
    Believe. Kevin Blackistone's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Post Count
    544
    I guess the point is rules and rules, but they are up to interpretation. The league will figure out two things 1) If they believe Amare was on his way to check-in 2) If they don't believe that, if they consider him "in the vicinity" of the bench.

    It's not a hard fast automatic thing that he'll get suspended just because he stepped on the court.
    Amare got up, walked past the coaches box limit and onto the court, and attempted to get in the altercation. He was then held back by coaches. If that's not breaking the rule, then I don't know what is.

    I will say this - I already question the NBA's integrity, and if they break their own rules just for the Suns I will never watch another NBA game again. I cannot watch a sporting event that's supposed to be on a fair playing field being fixed by the league officials just because they feel like it.

  25. #75
    Unsigned #1 Draft Pick RonMexico's Avatar
    My Team
    Phoenix Suns
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    4,768
    That's the problem. It's that selling a foul is now a reflex. If refs continue to buy it then players will continue to flop. It wasn't needed in this instance and will probably end up killing the Suns. If Nash would have took the foul without trying to sell it, they still would have won and all of this would have been avoided. He just chose a bad time to sell the flagrant.
    Wow - you've become immune to flopping and must think it occurs on every play. I don't think Nash was "selling the flagrant." I've been hit by guys 6 inches and 80 pounds bigger than me and I didn't have to "sell anything" when I got lifted off my feet and slid 15 feet across the hardwood on a foul before.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •