Sorry to repeat, but it is on topic here:
Steve Kerr really did say last night that "something is fundamentally wrong with a team that benefits from a cheap shot like that". He's a nice guy, and adoring Spurs fans rush to defend him. But some of his comments, especially coming from a recent ex-Spur, have added more fuel to the fire. D'Antoni has clearly been working this thing in hopes of gaining an edge for his team. Kerr has a vested financial interest in the Suns, and an unavoidable conflict of interest. In most businesses, individuals with a conflict of interest have to stay out of certain matters "to avoid the appearance of impropriety". Kerr is a (minority) team owner, with access to a national audience. He should probably avoid commenting on the controversies, and let D'Antoni do his own lobbying.
Kerr knows better than anybody that the rule is in place to prevent brawls from escalating out of control. He should have been first one to say what Stern did, that the Suns players removed themselves from Game 5...not talking about how fundamentally wrong it was, and how it benefitted the Spurs. It's immaterial who it benefitted, and the rule is only unfair if it is not enforced uniformly. A clean-cut ex-NBA player would know that. And his bias is showing.