And please prove to all of us how Manu's 9.4 points on .386 shooting carried Duncan and his 24.7 points on 53% shooting, 15.4 rebounds, 5.3 assists and 3.29 blocks in the '03 playoffs.
We're waiting.
That isn't proof.
"The Spurs would have three less championships without Tim Duncan." - Planet Earth
Why are you speaking in ducks?
Tell me how Manu is better than Duncan in '03.
i didnt say that manu is better than duncan, i said that w/o manu's courage, clutchness, playmaking, etc... duncan doesnt go anywhere.
do you understand?
"Why are you speaking in ducks?"...WHAT?????
If you could produce a quote where Pop says the Spurs would have championships without Duncan, you would be onto something.
If it hasnt been said already... that was Sean Elliott
Pop has said many times that without him (Pop) there would be championships. Without Duncan there would be none.
Trying to find the exact quote, but Pop has said it often.
So I wasn't just making that up. Thank goodness.
One on one? Up and down the court? Shaq wouldnt ever make it past half
court while Tim was heading back from scoring!
Shaq couldn't score if he couldn't jam his hand in the basket. When did he ever singlehandedly defend jump shots from up to 12 feet out? Tim would smoke him.
Last edited by BreezeHillBill; 05-21-2007 at 04:24 PM.
Hasn't Pop joked several times that his resignation will be turned in about 2 minutes after Tim's?
Wasn't a joke.
...and without Pippen, no rings for Jordan. And without Kobe/Wade, no rings for Shaq...without Jordan/Pippen, Shaq/Kobe no rings for Phil...etc...
yes we understand it takes more than one person to win the ring, but Tim is still the biggest reason (among several) why spurs won 3 les.
didn't he say 30 seconds?![]()
![]()
That last name deserves an * because it has too many letters and is hard to pronounce.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)