The bottom line: If it were Duncan and Oberto who were suspended, your whining would dwarf that of the supposed whining of Suns fans.
You'll have your time.
I gave up watching games the rest of this playoffs unless the Spurs get knocked off in protest of that snow job the league did on the Suns.
The bottom line: If it were Duncan and Oberto who were suspended, your whining would dwarf that of the supposed whining of Suns fans.
You'll have your time.
Hear hear!
Good for you, Pacer fan. I would have thought you would give up because the Pacers suck.
Duncan and Oberto have an IQ higher than 20, there in lies the rub in your supposed scenario.
It's not our problem if Amare is dumb as a rock.
No, I'm saying that the incident was treated fairly because Stern had no bias in that case. He wouldn't have risked the well deserved flack he is receiving for any team other than his precious Spurs.
Actually, when the game was on and I saw Duncan leave the bench I actually screamed "WHAT THE IS DUNCAN DOING?"
I don't blame the rules. I blame the players.
And the Spurs are precious, why? Because of the boatloads of money they bring to the league?
Or is it their ultra-exciting play?
Maybe it's the unbelievably flashy face of the league, the uber-animated Tim Duncan!
Yeah, please give me a link to this. Thanks for saying he didn't run 20 feet from the bench like Amare.
And the rules state that Duncan should have been suspended.
No on court altercation = no suspension.
Stern gave the spurs the series. That is a fact. It's time to move on though as this is old news. I'm sure you would whine to if you felt Stern took the series from your team.
Alright, since your IQ seems to be on-par with Amare's, lets make this simple.
NO ALTERCATION TOOK PLACE
Actually it states that nothing should have happened to Duncan - because there was no altercation.
Oh, you expect me to pull out a 5-second clip from hours of basketball? I can't even remember what game it was!
Sorry I didn't archive it in anticipation that the Suns would be screwed in a similarly obscure play in the following year's playoffs.
The bottom line: You avoided answering the question. Again. If Duncan and Bowen had been suspended, I'd have been angry at Duncan and Bowen, and the Spurs would still have won the series, because they are the better team. If they hadn't, I'd have blamed Duncan and Bowen. You play by the rules and you win with who's on the floor.
I ask again: Why should your team not have to follow the rules everybody else has to follow? I'm waiting for the answer.
Well said, Chokewitzki fan.
It was the beginning of one, and just as subjective as the one with Horry.
So you have no proof to back up your argument.
Good to know that in a battle of wits, you're unarmed.
Umm... go look at the tape again.
This time open your eyes.
Easy to say when you're sitting in the fat seat. I'd like the roles reversed to see just how understanding and by-the-book you are then.
Quick derail: I heard Grant Hill give your Boozer observation about "shooting from the perimeter" on ESPN not long after our conversation. It must have eaten you up that you couldn't tell me you stole the quote directly from Grant, who accidentally said the wrong word. No wonder I thought it was an oddly lucid basketball take coming from you; that's because it didn't.
Really, so did Elson start with Jones or vice versa?
Nope.
ing christ, do you sleep with a helmet on?
I'm sure there are countless examples. That's just the first that comes to my mind. View any series of a recent playoffs, and I'm sure you'll see one or two similar cases.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)