no but he had pippenesque/kobenesque nigths in the playoffs.
to who duncan won?, the only decent team was detroit or you you will say the knicks?, the nets?.....
Believe what you want.
Duncan is this team's cornerstone. Their foundation.
Last night the MVP of this series displayed the dominence he's known for on both ends of the court.
He will continue to do so and bring the fourth le to SA.
Along with his fourth MVP.
Tim
Yeah, but Pop also said "Without Manu, there are 2 less trophys on the wall".It's been hashed over again and again, but Pop said it best in numerous interviews. "Without Tim Duncan there are no championships."
But isn't that what makes this team so great? Any given night, any one of them can take over a game and have an MVP night.
We never know where it is going to come from, but one thing we are all pretty certain of, and that is: It will come....
I would have to say right now Tim gets MVP.
Next year Tony may give him a run for his money when we go for #5.
And this is why I hate MVP awards for team play.
You guys are ing re ed. Without everyone on the team there wouldn't be championships. That's why teams win and not individuals. It doesn't mean that one guy can't get a ing extra trophy for a great effort. If Parker puts up 27 and 9 through the finals I can't believe anyone would say he didn't deserve MVP.
Well, Parker is playing against one guy with one foot part of the game. The other guy is shooting 78% from the floor.
We'll see how things go from here.
Pippenesque? Did you even watch Pippen play? Listen, I loved what SJax brought to the table, but I wasn't blinded to his weaknesses. He shot a horrible % from the field and I cringed when he put the ball on the floor. Here are SJax's 2002-03 playoff stats:
12.8 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 2.7 APG, 41.4% FGP
And speaking of decent teams, the only decent team that LA met in the Finals, it folded like a cheap suit. You're telling me that the Nets, 76ers and Pacers were worthy opponents?
LOL @ saying Parker, without Duncan, Parker isn't
what happens when duncan fouls out?
what about when parker fouls out?
enough said.
duncans suckers, take out duncans sperma off your eyes
Lebron first.
Lebron first.
what i meant was that the spurs get into deep trouble when tim's in foul trouble. even when tim's just not in his groove, we suffer. it's not the same when tony doesn't play well.
If Duncan were to foul out, he wouldn't deserve MVP. Why are you factoring in someone's career body of work for the NBA finals MVP, anyway? It's based on one game, so far. If you want to point to his five blocks and his defensive numbers, that's one thing, but don't point to his performance against the Nets four years ago.
I can't believe this. Part of me wants Duncan to take the next game5 off just to show some of these idiots what would happen.
Tim is the guy who sets the tone for everything. The Spurs are nothing without him.
Manu had somewhat of a case for MVP in 05 but really it was about duncan then too.
This is unbelievable. How can you be underrated by your own fans?
Oh wait, it's the story of Tim Duncan's life.
Tim= MUVP- Most Under-Valued Player
Boobie, of course!
So then why not just give him the finals MVP before the ing series? It obviously doesn't matter if anyone else plays well, it's just because they're on his team. Just shut up already. Nobody is undervaluing Duncan, but Parker's playing great too. Give it a ing rest.
TD 4 MVP
Emperor Duncan>>>>>>>>>>>>>King James
mike brown
that guy is giving us this series
A vote. Thank you.TD 4 MVP
Emperor Duncan>>>>>>>>>>>>>King James
on this game, I think Tony has a slight edge, but at the end of the series (if we win it) it will be Tim, no doubt
Sas
Td
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
