Don't bother; he is a Suns fan after all
You forgot the word "immediate", dumbass. If it just said vicinity, you'd have a point.
From dictionary.com:
3. having no object or space intervening; nearest or next: in the immediate vicinity
Don't bother; he is a Suns fan after all
Dear Lord, do you read the rules?? It's "immediate vicinity", and if you think that Amare stayed within the "immediate vicinity" of the bench - well then you are seriously beyond hope.
Amare broke the rule. Deal with it. Duncan did not break the rule. Deal with it.
WOW, talk about desperate....
Everything up until now is void after reading in the rules
"all players not participating in the game must remain in the immediate vicinity of their bench."
GRAY AREA ALL DAY LONG.
Don't be so angry and upset because your spurs had it handed to them!![]()
Haha....who gives a if you put "immediate" in front of it.
It's still a gray area.
Nice effort though.
Do you not ing read? Having the word immediate in front completely eliminates a gray area. "Immediate vicinity", like I stated above, should mean that there should be no "space or object between" the player and the bench, meaning the player should remain exactly on the bench. Now move on to your next stupid point.
You're the one who said a fight must consist of punches thrown. You were wrong.
You're the one who said the rule states a "fight" instead of an "altercation". You were wrong.
I was just quoting you and proving you wrong.
You then stated it must be within the vicinity, as opposed to immediate vicinity. Won't say you're wrong, but you stated a half-truth.
You are now claiming that Amare somehow stayed within the immediate vicinity. Hate to break this to you, but your credibility is just about zero at this point. You've been proven incorrect in every one of your weak defenses of Amare. There is no possible, credible definition of "immediate vicinity" that Amare could have fallen under.
He left the immediate vicinity of the bench. Deal with it.
Amare broke the rule. Deal with it.
Stern enforced the rule ENTIRELY keeping within the framework of the rule, the intent of the rule, and the precedent for the rule. Deal with it.
Duncan did not break the rule. Deal with it.
Ok, "dumbass".
So whats the DEFINITION of immediate vicinity???
5 ft, 10 ft, 15ft
Or you just an ignorant person who would like to think they know what they're talking about
Hahaa, the most laughable thing about this thread is you just realized today - many months after the incident that the rule says "altercation" and mentions the word "vicinity." Were you living under a rock during the playoffs?
Never mind. Don't answer that.
I've grown bored with you and this thread.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)