I guess he meant The Globe, no?
All the "Jena" search term got was Al Unser Jr.'s domestic violence arrest.
I'll ask again -- all this is do ented, right?
I guess he meant The Globe, no?
..because the National Enquirer was never right...
![]()
Those incidents have been on the record for months.
The reason this case is a problem is not because some black kids should get away with beating up a white kid without punishment. They deserve punishment. The problem is that the narrative reveals a series of events where whites engaging in bad behavior (nooses, assaulting blacks, aiming firearms at blacks) either were not punished or had their punishments reduced, while blacks engaging in bad behavior got grossly trumped-up charges pressed against them. It's called differential prosecution on account of race, it was standard practice in the Deep South during the Jim Crow era, and apparently also in central Louisiana today. It is a federal crime under civil rights law, though a difficult one to prosecute.
Then they'll be easy to link. I'm new to the story and just want to see independent confirmation.Those incidents have been on the record for months.
I have another question. Aren't these public officials being discussed popularly elected in the parish?
Couldn't they just be voted out of office by the 80+% black population?
Apparently the road to change here in 2007 leads to media friendly protests and not the ballot box. I have the feeling that soon enough we will be seeing reports that African-American high school students in Jena have to sit in the back of the bus...
I'm not sure if this is a story of stupidity or gullibility. Perhaps both.
Jena is 85% white. La Salle Parish which Jena is located in is 86% white.
Sorry, I got the numbers transposed when I saw the graphic on TV. Thanks.
If these patterns can indeed be proven, fine. I still don't get why the kid is still in jail.
This is his 4th or 5th run in with the law, apparently.
Jesse and Al don't have $90K in their pockets, I guess.
So is this still too harsh?
Hey, it involves a noose.
This is like beating your head up against a wall. Nobody's trying to say that their actions were justified. What people are protesting is the differential prosecution on account of race and if you don't see that well it speaks volumes about you.
Last edited by TLWisfoine; 09-20-2007 at 07:27 PM.
Do you know what aggravated assault is? I think if those 6 boys really wanted to kill him or do him great bodily harm he would not be able to attend any function that night.
This issue is so much bigger than those 6 boys. If differential prosecution on account of race can happen to them, then it can happen to anybody.
Last edited by TLWisfoine; 09-20-2007 at 07:27 PM.
If assaulting someone can result in a criminal charge, don't do it.
If those six kids had been white they would had gotten a slap on the wrist and told "boys will be boys".
I doubt it. Especially if they beat up a black student. Even this school's administration couldnt have covered that up.
They beat him until he was unconscious then a bystander broke it up. I'm tired of the black "community" crying and rallying behind criminals.Do you know what aggravated assault is? I think if those 6 boys really wanted to kill him or do him great bodily harm he would not be able to attend any function that night.
free mumia
free oj
free stanley tookie williams
free mike vick
black quaterbacks are treated unfairly
juneteenth violence
ahhhh righteous movements
Last edited by SodaPoop; 09-21-2007 at 12:51 AM.
I think the major points that were not brought up are:
1) The shotgun carried by the white was being used as self defense, yet he didn't shoot, and had it taken away from him anyway.
2) The kid that was beaten was still beaten after he was unconscious. He could have been killed. That is why the stiffer charges were brought. If they stopped after he was down, things would be so much different.
Now I assume there are still some pretty deep racial tension there, but when you hear all the facts, did the punishments match the crimes? As far as I know from everything I heard, they do.
Provokative actions were taken by both sides. However, th first amendment protects such actions also.
1. Self defense against whom, any and all blacks he sees. Also I'll try to remember that you can only defend yourself once you've been shot at.
2. Then tell me why the white kids who did the same to another white kid only got a misdemeanor assault charge, that person could have been killed.
You are really coming off as somebody that supports differential prosecution on account of race.
I am quite sure we all have the full story on what occured in
Jenna. I just know we have. The media, Jesse and the other
groups would be sure to give us the un-slanted truth of the
matter.
On the surface it looks like the criminal justice system failed.
It was a fist fight, unfair, but not unusual, I am sure worst
happens here in SA on a weekly basis. There seems to be
lots we don't know.
You can get aggravated assault for less than knocking somebody out, which is what happened here. The boys recovery time is irrelevant, IMO, although it sure seems to get people worked up.
This thread is the first I have read of a similar cir stance being treated differently (ie. a group of white thugs beat up a black kid); it that happened, and those white boys weren't arrested, then they should have been. Doesn't mean the black thugs should be let off easy.
nothing happens in a vacuum.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)