Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 77
  1. #51
    I'm still not sure how an assistant coach taking HGH is a compe ive advantage. It is illegal and should be punished for breaking the rules, but 5 games? and Belichik gets a fine that will probably get paid for him anyway?
    I doubt it was viewed as a compe ive advantage, but it was punished as a substance abuse issue.

  2. #52
    The Crominator J.T.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    15,142
    Highly doubtful there. It's going to take more than 1 week of beating a team that was primed to come back down to earth to prove that.
    I like how the Patriots beat a bad team and everyone is all over their jock. The Colts beat a good team and still have to prove themselves. ing awesome.

    Newsflash...it's still Week 2 for everyone. Let's see how the Patriots play against a real team (such as their opponent this week) before we start booking their flights to Arizona.

  3. #53
    I'm still not sure how an assistant coach taking HGH is a compe ive advantage
    If an assistant coach is getting HGH, common sense tells you that he very well could be supplying players with it.

  4. #54
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    15,826
    so, since someone somewhere at some time cheated and got away with it, everyone is now cheating, most just haven't been caught?

    since your team has been proven guilty, now every team is guilty until proven innocent?
    yes. this isn't a court of law. it's just common ing sense. why would coaches cover their mouths when they talk unless they knew somebody was trying to read their lips?

  5. #55
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,052
    If an assistant coach is getting HGH, common sense tells you that he very well could be supplying players with it.
    That's why you investigate (as the NFL did) and when that investigation tell you that he was getting it for personal use (as the investigation did), then you give him a small fine and a 1 games suspension. Not the abberation that he got. When you use deductive reasoning and actually apply investigation techniques that have been around for thousands of years (nothing new), then you don't have to take guesses and lay down some harsh ass punishment about that you don't know. Common sense would tell that to you.

  6. #56
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    If an assistant coach is getting HGH, common sense tells you that he very well could be supplying players with it.
    I agree with that and if there was evidence to that, then I would have no problem with the punishment. However, there has been no proof of that and its not right to impose a suspension like that on the possibility that he might have done that.

  7. #57
    That's why you investigate (as the NFL did) and when that investigation tell you that he was getting it for personal use (as the investigation did), then you give him a small fine and a 1 games suspension. Not the abberation that he got. When you use deductive reasoning and actually apply investigation techniques that have been around for thousands of years (nothing new), then you don't have to take guesses and lay down some harsh ass punishment about that you don't know. Common sense would tell that to you.
    Reading ESPN once in a while would tell you that no "investigation" like that ever happened. Wilson was the one telling the media of his diabetes and impotence. The NFL simply found out about the HGH and suspended him accordingly.

  8. #58
    I cannot grok its fullnes leemajors's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    24,176
    i think Wilson was immediately forthcoming with his receipts and finances in an attempt to show he was using them only for himself. he cooperated fully. now that doesn't mean a whole lot if you want to be cynical, but at least he wasn't trying to hide anything.

  9. #59
    I cannot grok its fullnes leemajors's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    24,176
    The difference between 2006 Mav Fan is that he thought 67 wins equals trophy.... kind of like how Patsy fans think signing some big names equals trophy... hmmmmm. This Colts team is better than last year's, don't see why it's impossible to think they would beat the Pats again. Don't know where you got that idea buddy.
    it's quite simple - mav fan thought they were over the hump because they finally beat the spurs. colts fan thinks they will never lose to the pats again because they finally beat them. you do the math.

  10. #60
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    The NFL simply found out about the HGH and suspended him accordingly.
    If the NFL did that without investigating, that is even worse.

  11. #61
    You can't be in the NFL and take HGH. Period. End of story.

  12. #62
    The Last Good Sport samikeyp's Avatar
    Post Count
    28,298
    Agreed but the punishment has to fit the crime. I just don't think it did in this case.

  13. #63
    I like how the Patriots beat a bad team and everyone is all over their jock. The Colts beat a good team and still have to prove themselves. ing awesome.

    Newsflash...it's still Week 2 for everyone. Let's see how the Patriots play against a real team (such as their opponent this week) before we start booking their flights to Arizona.
    I'm not all over the Patriots jock either. But as you said - IT'S WEEK 2. For all you know, that "good team" that the Colts beat is a 7-9 or 8-8 team (probably not because the Saints' division is pathetic).

  14. #64
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,052
    Reading ESPN once in a while would tell you that no "investigation" like that ever happened. Wilson was the one telling the media of his diabetes and impotence. The NFL simply found out about the HGH and suspended him accordingly.
    Well then the NFL really ed up. You have to investigate that before going off. If I was Wilson I'd think about appealing the suspension and fine on that fact.

  15. #65
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,052
    Espn Sucks

  16. #66
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,052
    You can't be in the NFL and take HGH. Period. End of story.
    But why was he fined 1/3 of his yearly salary for using HGH himself with no evidence of distribution and Belichick was only fined 12% of his yearly salary for actually cheating the game? That's bull .

  17. #67
    The Crominator J.T.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    15,142
    it's quite simple - mav fan thought they were over the hump because they finally beat the spurs. colts fan thinks they will never lose to the pats again because they finally beat them. you do the math.
    Colts have a 3 game streak against the Pats right now, but I'll bet you didn't know that.

  18. #68
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,052
    Colts have a 3 game streak against the Pats right now, but I'll bet you didn't know that.
    But only one in the playoffs when it counts.

  19. #69
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    15,826
    Colts have a 3 game streak against the Pats right now, but I'll bet you didn't know that.
    Yeah but it's not like they've owned the Patriots. 1 win the Patriots were decimated with injuries, second one the Patriots would have taken it to overtime if Kevin Faulk can hold onto a ing pass, and the last one if Troy Brown runs the right ing route then the Patriots get the first down and can run out the clock.

    No excuses, Colts won and deserved to do so, but the Colts aren't exactly owning the Patriots the way the Patriots used to absolutely own the Colts.

  20. #70
    http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/f...icleid=1031649


    For Bill Belichick to escape Camera-gate without a suspension wasn't sitting well with rival organizations yesterday, particularly since Belichick's decision to use a camera on the sidelines flouted the rules and compromised the integrity of the game. "They fined him the maximum allowed, so certainly no one has a problem with that," one league insider said. "And they had to penalize the organization just to send the message that if a coach does this, everyone will be held accountable. But a suspension should have been the starting point, and right now there are some very angry people around the league."

  21. #71
    New Fang. . . O-Factor's Avatar
    Post Count
    2,276
    Yeah but it's not like they've owned the Patriots. 1 win the Patriots were decimated with injuries, second one the Patriots would have taken it to overtime if Kevin Faulk can hold onto a ing pass, and the last one if Troy Brown runs the right ing route then the Patriots get the first down and can run out the clock.

    No excuses, Colts won and deserved to do so, but the Colts aren't exactly owning the Patriots the way the Patriots used to absolutely own the Colts.
    Every losing team in every single NFL game played can always use the what if excuse. Don't spew that. Colts have beaten the Pats the last three games. Period. Owned.

  22. #72
    I cannot grok its fullnes leemajors's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    24,176
    Colts have a 3 game streak against the Pats right now, but I'll bet you didn't know that.
    i don't give a , they have beat them once in the playoffs. didn't the cavs sweep the reg season series from the spurs?

  23. #73
    Based dirk4mvp's Avatar
    My Team
    Indianapolis Colts
    Post Count
    24,173
    i don't give a , they have beat them once in the playoffs. didn't the cavs sweep the reg season series from the spurs?

    But the cavs didn't beat the spurs in the postseason, the Colts did beat the pats in the postseason. What's your point ?

  24. #74
    I cannot grok its fullnes leemajors's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    24,176
    But the cavs didn't beat the spurs in the postseason, the Colts did beat the pats in the postseason. What's your point ?
    it's nowhere near a given that the colts beat the patties in the postseason because they are 3-0 recently, with one postseason win. thick head fratty can't realize this.

  25. #75
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    15,826
    Every losing team in every single NFL game played can always use the what if excuse.
    There's a difference between dominating one of the league's most potent offenses of all time and holding them to 3 points in one playoff game & picking off the league MVP 4 times in another, and just barely squeaking by because one player ran the wrong route on a 3rd down that would have sealed the game in last years AFC le game. Do you not ing get that?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •