Reply With Quote
Beno, Barry and Williams for Corey Brewer.
We need an offensive force down low to take some attention of Duncan and at the same time can get some rebounds. Elton Brand sounds like a good idea, but if we could do that same thing with Oden, we are repeating for the first time. It depends on whether Oden will play in the playoffs though....have him for next year then.
Beno, Barry and Williams for Corey Brewer.
kid, writing your extended posts on an idiotic proposal takes ten times the life time than learning some basic knowledge about NBA.
the rule, that salaries have to match (+/-25%), when teams over the cap do a trade, is THE basic rule about the whole trade science.
what you do is like suggesting to strengthen the defense by sending a 6th player on the court. some people might get the impression, that you don't know anything about basketball and it won't help your point to insist, that you don't are not going to read through a book of rules. well, maybe any book.
As a Mavs fan I would trade Dirk for Tim.
That trade would not work since Ducks post @ SR already. Besides that Amente dude is an asshat I have met him in person. He practically ruined SR on his own. With help from Mombear and LadySpur.
I can say this, that Thompson vato knows his !
Jason Terry for Tony Parker
I second that
Beno and Barry for Maggette
manu for kobe
swing a deal for some young injured PF/C, Brand, Oden, Yao, someone more attainable. cause we can wait
LMAO at the risk of turning this into a Scola thread....oh what the .
Scola Thread whooo hoooo!!!
If you knew then what you know now would you have traded Oberto and Elson to get Scola???
Can we get Scola back? Maybe for Bonner + Beno..
Well it's boring if it has to be realistic, I'm not going to go around looking up player salaries and contracts and to figure out who could be traded for who...
LAME...
Some people might think reading and writing are not your strong suits either.
rights to Splitter, and Beno for Scola
Parker and throw-ins for Garnett. The deal that should have gotten done but didn't.
If you're Minnesota, who do you want... some scrubs and Jefferson or some scrubs and Parker? I'm taking Parker.
Barry for Nachbar.
wow, big deal, aber wir können auch gerne in meiner Muttersprache diskutieren, wenn Du glaubst, dass Grammatik und Rechtschreibung Deine stärkeren Seiten sind. Ich kann es Dir ja auch so nochmals mitteilen: Du bist tatsächlich der ahnungsloseste Poster in diesem Forum. Das wäre ja kein Problem, jeder fängt klein ein, aber die eigene Ahnungslosigkeit für Genialität zu halten, ist zumeist ein eher tragischer Zug.
Insanity! Hey, I respect KG, but that would totally unbalance our team. KG is an alpha, so is TD in his own way, and we'd have no point guard. Also, Parker is just hitting his prime and he's on a decent contract, while KG is overpaid and hasn't proven he can lead anyone anywhere. Also, he relies on his athleticism and may start to decline rapidly at any time after 33-4.
The beauty of the Spurs is the balance - Parker, Manu and TD all do different things to complement each other perfectly. That's why they have 3 rings together. They are like the hands on a watch - you need all three different hands to tell the time properly. You are talking about replacing the second hand with another hour hand! A watch with two hour hands loses all precision.
Your trade looks good on paper, but in practice it would unbalance the team.
That's about the only trade in here that's even possible.
Beno and Barry for "proven good player X" simply ain't gonna happen, even if we throw in a first rounder (in all likelihood #26-30).
I like the idea of Danny Granger as a Spur, but he's going to take Manu to prise away from Indy, and no way in I give Manu away.
NO. I think Fab's hard work fits much more in the Spurs than Scola's offensive talent. Cisco's defensive, too, he has his moments.
I have to dumb down what I were saying so that you could understand me.
Again, again, again. Scola bandwagon sucks!.
Of course you would! Proven winner vs proven choker all the way! No way in we'd even entertain the idea though!
I'd keep Bonner over Scola anyway because Bonner's game fits the Spurs. He is Rob's understudy, he hustles, and he has range. That means he can play the 4 next to Tim and spread the floor. Scola and Tim together would just clog the post because Scola doesn't have the height to make the passes DRob used to make to TD, and nor does he have range to the 3.Can we get Scola back? Maybe for Bonner + Beno..
Scola would've been lovely low post insurance if Tim went down, but otherwise he's superfluous to the Spurs. Pity we gave him away to a divisional rival, but otherwise, who cares?
Since it takes a player a year to play well in the Spurs' system, I wouldn't trade anybody that's been in the rotation the past couple of years. That makes the question to easy to answer. Beno for almost anything.
Beno for Kobe and 2 number 1 draft picks in 2010 and 2011
Not really.
TD can play center and KG can play PF. Both will demand double teams. Remember today TD is the only Spurs player demanding double team consistently. The combination of TD and KG would further enhance our le chances lot more than TP. Also, KG does not need to lead this team. This team has more leaders. KG can take care of his usual business.
After TD's retirement, TP can not take this team anywhere. Need proof? Look at Kobe.
The only point I agree with you on is price for KG.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
