Well after all the dimm-o-craps do eat their own. As well
as anyone else that stands in the way.
Oh, let us get back to the wonderful dimm-o-craps.
The old Realtor Harry now wants to take part of the credit
for a letter where he tries to smear Rush for something
that wasn't true. And like a true American Chump wants
to come up with the suggestion that it is a good idea to
smear someone so it can raise all this money for a "Charity".
You know like he supports the troops, he just doesn't support
their mission. You gotta really love these people. How
can they be wrong. I mean after all they support the
troops. Well, they say they do. And after all their heart
is in the right place.
Well after all the dimm-o-craps do eat their own. As well
as anyone else that stands in the way.
Why not?
If Reid can make a letter worth $4 million to charity, he should do it as often as possible.
And it's a charity -- no quotes needed -- unless you are questioning the status of the organization Rush chose..
Oh. You made a donation to our troops. And now can
we get you to really support them, by supporting their
mission?
how does one support the troops and the mission, Xray?
Was that his original intent? To raise four mil for the
troops and law enforcement? Geee, I didn't know that.
Wonder why he didn't announce that on the day he
smeared Rush. I just know he had to talk to Mr. May
(Mays) before he did the deed. Don't you?
I just wonder if he felt the squish between the toes when
he stepped in it?![]()
Since we are already there, there is really no choice. I am glad the mission is a halfway realistic, reasoned counterinsurgency strategy unlike the first three years of the war. Unfortunately it's probably too late. We'll pull out soon enough -- that's inevitable -- then the Iraqis will really start killing each other.
Who cares?
It's $4 million for charity.
He should do it every week if it means $4 million to charity.
Voting Republican in the next election.
Republicans won't be elected unless they present an exit strategy from Iraq.
Yeah, because the current one has done a great job handling the current mission.
Well stupid, The good old Realtor, should be a used car
salesman, Reid didn't make the letter worth four mil.
Rush did. Reid just wrote it and his stooges signed it
thinking they would make people cower with their
purported power. Guess Rush kinda demonstrated the
people still have the power.
Reid wrote a letter that Rush's fans valued at $4 million for the benefit of a charity.
He should write more of them so Rush's fans will give more to charity.
I say send Chump over there and let him negotiate the
terms of us leaving. How say you?
No lets don't he will surrender and then gas will go
over four dollars a gallon. And all those workers for
Halliburton wont have a job. Well except those that
make the Halliburton brief cases....
the power to do what exactly? donate to a worthy cause? we've never been in danger of losing that power, and it shouldn't take spite for the other party to move people to flex that power.
doesn't it seem strange to see people wanting others to support a mission that kills our troops for no reason?
couldn't we just kill them here for no reason? it would save money. the expense of getting them to Iraq only to have them brought back in a box (and cloaked in secrecy) could be a significant amount of savings.
Chump we won, you lost.......That's they way the
cookie crumbles.......live with it....
I'm sure he'll survive.
With whom? We've already decided to start pulling out. It's going to happen regardless.
Is this what the war is about?No lets don't he will surrender and then gas will go
over four dollars a gallon. And all those workers for
Halliburton wont have a job. Well except those that
make the Halliburton brief cases....
Won what?
What was at stake here?
I think there have been a few times in the last couple of
months where the power of the people have demonstrated
they still have power. Like immigration, like the resolution
on Armenian, like SCHIPS. This is only the latest. Do you
think Reid went onto the Senate floor to do the "WE" thing
because he wanted to. Live and learn OG, live and learn.
The Dimm-o-craps are getting a good lesson right now.
Or should I say Liberals, Progressives (Regressives) and
Socialist. I just hope the people like me don't let up.
smearing hush??![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
hush makes a living smearing people ray!
the people spoke? like the 2006 congressional elections?
He damn sure has. And, he did so in the face of overwhelming and unprecendented Congressional meddling by Democrats. Not to mention seditious and treasonous acts by the media and leakers within the Intelligence agencies of the U.S.
By any measure -- arguments about the legitimacy of the war aside -- the war in Iraq and Afghanistan have been the most successful and humane in the history of warfare.
In other words, if you believed this war were legitimate (which I know you don't), you'd have to concede the United States military has achieved in Iraq -- at the cost of almost 4,000 lives -- what we couldn't achieve in Vietnam at a cost of 55,000 lives or Korea, another 55,000 lives, or what we, thankfully achieved, in Europe and the Pacific theaters of WWII at a cost of nearly 500,000 lives.
Collateral damage is less and civilian casualties are lower than in any other war we've fought.
The stated objective of removing the Ba'athist Regime of Saddam Hussein was achieved in about three weeks...despite the defeatist warnings that it would take 10's of thousands of body bags to ship home the dead American Troops.
The stated objective of routing al Qaeda in Iraq appears nearly complete and that appears to be bringing about a renewed sense of cooperation in Iraq which will improve security and stability in the region.
Already violent deaths are down over 85% in some of the worst areas of that country. Areas that were reporting 150 murders/violent deaths per week, just last month, are down to approximately 5 deaths per week.
, if Iraq stabilizes and starts operating from the Cons ution it has already passed, they will have gone from tyranny to democracy in a shorter amount of time than did the United States when it declared its independence from Britain in 1776. Not only they, they will have done so with a smaller per capita loss of life than did the colonies.
Afghanistan is the same...no matter what the CBC, the BBC, and NPR say.
Actually, a presidential veto against a a bill that is widely popular is pretty anti-democratic (small d). That's going to pass with only slight tweaking.like SCHIPS
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)