Just the stuff I could find, leading up to the invasion, that talked about things other than WMDs.
Just the stuff I could find, leading up to the invasion, that talked about things other than WMDs.
yeah, throw in the kitchen sink, or anything else that can mask the stink. i think we also accused him of stealing martha stewart recipes.
well saddam did try to kill bush's daddy.
Gee, I read all the stuff Bush has done. Don't you just wished
Clinton was back in office and none of this stuff would have happened. Just a "little" sex in the White House. Well maybe a
"whole lot of sex". But hey it doesn't matter. We know old Bill
could control himself, I mean who could have someone giving
them a little head, while talking on the telephone. Oppps,
I forgot oral is not sex.
gee a sexual buffet or an unecessary war.. hmm tough one..
Yeah, and just think, Bush blew up the WTC, not those
silly bas s that blew up our Embassies, shot down our
black hawks, blew up a warship. Ah, you know. They
were just funnin, Clinton had it all under control. Right?
you asked me what i preferred and i told you.
Tried to assassinate a president of the United States. Yet another reason. Thanks.
If the war were unnecessary and the case against President Clinton were about sex, you'd have yet another point on top of the head of yours.
that;s right 25% of the dead enders of this country still believe that Iraq had is related with the war on terror.. you don't get it do you? The American public doesn't buy that iraq is a necessary war in fighting terrorism...and rightfully so..
Iraq was invaded to deal with the threat posed by 20 Muslim fanatics with box cutters.
You are the American Public? I don't think so.
No, but keeping them from trading in the box cutters for something a bit more lethal was part of the rationale.
Thanks for playing, pick up your parting gift on the way out.
Right so we attacked the country without anything more lethal..brilliant!
Clinton lobbed a cruise missile into their intel service headquarters in response. Result -- no more actions against the US.
Clinton lobbed more cruise missiles and bombs into Iraq during Desert Fox. Result -- complete stoppage of WMD programs and an intense uprising that almost toppled Saddam's regime unintentionally.
Iraq was no threat to the US. At best they were going to get into another protracted war with Iran. Wouldn't that be terrible?
ray you can deny it all you want but there is a reason why public support for Iraq is relegated to the war s..
Except they would never get anything from Saddam, the kind of person they hate more than Americans. Your rationale is a lie.
Yes, Democrats, with a complicit media, have waged a successful campaign of disinformation about the war culminating with the Harry Reid lie, last year, that the war was irretreivably lost.
Keep talking George because as the war is becoming more and more apparently won, the opinion will shift and you, sir, will find yourself in the minority on Iraq, once again.
Americans are fickle. That's all. They're fair weather fans. Particularly when answering anonymous polls with leading questions. Convince them we're doing poorly in something and they'll oppose it for fear of being on the wrong side. Succeed, and they were right there with you all along.
The American people want to get out of iraq. All the american public has gotten is 'we're the turning the corner' crap. Bush still can't articulate what victory is so whenever we get there the American people won't reflect and say oh well this war was worth it afterall and now since we are winning I support it.. do you think they are stupid?
No ? I want to get out of Iraq too. If that poll question doesn't get a 100% response, there are some pretty ignorant people in this country.
I think you're stupid. I also think American sentiment is getting ready to make a seismic shift back in favor of a winning war in Iraq. And, that's my opinion.
Last edited by Yonivore; 11-15-2007 at 04:38 PM.
Do you ever read anything but this forum. We have
turned the corner in Iraq. People are returning from other
countries. There is a whole long way to go. But there was
before we got there. But now they have a chance to
be real people. And determine what they want. And
rest assured, we are not a conquering army like some
would want you to believe.
None of that changes the fact that most Americans don't connect Iraq with the war on terror. I am no military expert but it would make sense that if we had more boots on the ground we could hold more ground. that would concieveably make things safer. However the solution is a political one so please forgive me for not delcaring victory just yet. let's assume this all works out and we have victory parades across the USA.. still doesn't change the fact that the majority of Americans don't connect Iraq with the war on terror..
Let's see how sympathetic the people are when they are paying $3-$4 for a gallon of gas because the hidden costs of the war have devalued the dollar even more...Keep talking George because as the war is becoming more and more apparently won, the opinion will shift and you, sir, will find yourself in the minority on Iraq, once again.
European politicians have had the balls and prudence to tax gasoline into the $7 range many years ago.
As one of many results, the Euro Ford Focus gets 55 mph highway, while the US Ford Focus gets 35 mph highway, with US car mfrs saying it's impossible even to meet an aggressive CAFE (which wasn't passed anyway) before 2020.
There is a conspiracy between oilcos, Detroit, and their D.C. s, a drug-dealing triumvirate, to keep America addicted to oil.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)