Where have I defended him? I specifically said I wasn't arguing his steroid use. The only thing I've done in this thread is prove that the photo was shopped.
Then you must understand how hits work. Anyone can upend another player depending on the balance of upended player and the player's foot position. Merriman got caught in a bad position and got ed up good by a little man. He also got up instantly and continued pursuit of the play. Have you never witnessed a kicker nail someone on a kickoff return?By the way, I've played and coached more football than you'll ever know.
It's ignorant comments like this that make me even wonder why I'm arguing with you. You know nothing, you are a ing idiot.Face it, Merriman isn't as effective as he was last year. And, the only reason he was so effective was because he had the help of a little thing we all like to call steroids.
That is fact.
Did you happen to notice how much Merriman was used in blitzes last year? Did you happen to notice how often he's been used in coverage this year? Merriman is blitzing 50% less than he was last year. Phillips and Cottrell have very different ideas on how to use Merriman and his production shows. A person who claims to know as much about football as you claim shouldn't have to have such obvious things pointed out to them. Less blitzes = Less sacks. Pretty simple equation.

Reply With Quote




