logic hopes to make your acquaintance, someday.
some like j6 can stand their ground, but most of them lose their cool and start insulting your grandma, and the academics at your school.
Just as bad as buff fans.
logic hopes to make your acquaintance, someday.
he's my best friend.
thats actually true, though i was speaking generally. j-6 has always been pretty cool...as has sami.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Damn, talk about being slapped in public & doing nothing about it.
except he's not and Aggie, nor was he discussing Texas A&M football.
....talk about missing the point.
Lemme guess, the point of the most recent guff is how tough the gies are & how no one else has a schedule that measures up?![]()
![]()
![]()
you don't like to read...like most t-sips. nothings changed.
I don't give a what you say, but if you're going to make statements like you have here at least have the info to back it up when called on it. You brought two things to this argument, jack and . If you're going to accuse a team of dodging opponents when they just finished a home/home with one of the top powers in football then you better bring a of a lot of valid information to support your stance. You brought one article and didn't bother to bring any non-conference schedules for other major powerhouses. When I call you on it you go off on some lame ass tangent about free countries and other random bull . I called you out, asked you to show proof of the bull that you were spouting, gave you over 12 hours to do it, and you brought jack and . Next time get your facts straight before spouting off.
tantrumsaregood,
...i can't believe how mad you get on here, lol, you're such a little girl. t.u. usually schedules cream puffs when their teams are very good...they just do. they'll have their exceptions here and there, and a lot of other teams do as well, but t.u. was a team that shouldn't. of course, none of that matters now as t.u. is slowly fading away...
For any fan of any major school to dig on other schools for scheduling weak teams is just stupid. Everyone does it. They shouldn't but they do. Texas, A&M, OU, tOSU, USC or any big time D-1 school should have the nad to mix in some tough compe ion. As a Horn fan, I was happy when they had the home and home with tOSU then they went back to Little Sisters of the Poor State. You get a playoff system in place then I think you will see better matchups in September because you won't have as much fear of an early season loss.
JohnGatesWilkesBootheAggie,
You spend a lot of time bashing THE University of Texas in this thread. You state that "T-Sips" are illogical and don't like to read. I've read through this thread and have a couple of questions for you.
Have you noticed that trainwreck of a program the great "Coach Fran" put out there the last five years?
I have another question for you. Is the A&M football program better off today than it was five years ago?
In is first press conference at A&M five years ago, the nasally voice football phenom coach Fran uttered these words in a sentence - "should have did" (I am not making that up). I knew then and there he would fit in well at College Station. He could neither speak proper English nor coach winning football. The '07 aggie team was loaded with 5th year seniors and still could not win a very weak Big 12 South.
By no means is U.T. football on top of the world at this moment. But at least a very recent National Championship trophy is in Austin - I will be dead and buried a long time before a NC trophy is won at texas a&m. I believe Mack Brown has the ability to make the correct moves with his coaching staff and bring in talented football players in the future.
If you watch games on Sunday, you'll notice a lot more former Texas players playing in the NFL than "former student" aggies players.
Here's another question for you.
Do you feel good about hiring a coach who has not set foot in a recruits house in over a decade? There's no doubt Mike Sherman is a better human being than DF, but I don't think being away from the college game that long is a good thing.
Mack Brown has the ability to make moves with his coaching staff but not the desire. Greg Davis needs to go.
Wrong, USC, Notre Dame, Cal, all those consistently have tough scheduling.
So USC, Notre Dame and Cal never schedule weak teams?
The entire ND schedule is not weak but it has cupcakes just like everyone else...the service academies and Stanford come to mind for ND. Then again, ND was so bad this year, they all looked good.
Cal had La Tech and Colorado State, a combined 8-16. I do give Cal props for their home and home with Tennessee though.
SC had Nebraska (not what they once were) Idaho and ND, a combined 9-27. Yes, ND is a once a year rival and has had its moments. Nebraska may have been scheduled 10 years ago but probably not and Idaho?
You are trying to paint Texas as the only school that schedules these weak team and the fact is that they are not. Are some schools better than others? Absolutely but to imply that Texas is the only one or even one of the worse ones is wrong. You mentioned Kansas...much worse, as was K-State in the Snyder Era. A lot of Big 10 schools are horrible too. I stand by my point. Everyone does it...to varying degrees but everyone does it.
Last edited by samikeyp; 12-27-2007 at 02:18 PM.
Wow, you sure have no ability to spot anger. I'm just calling out the idiots who I am supposed to call out.
You, OTOH, have some sort of University of Texas penis envy as evidenced by every single post you've made in the last 2 years.
Yeah. I'm glad A&M agreed to the series with Arkansas. One would think that more D1 programs would opt to schedule some tough non-conference opponents, especially with strength of schedule a factor in the BCS. Then again, Ohio State made it to the le game with a schedule of:
Youngstown State
Akron
at Washington
Northwestern
at Minnesota
No. 23 Purdue
Kent State
Michigan State
at No. 25 Penn State
No. 21 Wisconsin
Illinois
at No. 21 Michigan
They did schedule UDub (I'm guessing they agreed to that when the Huskies were much better), but ending up with 1 loss against that schedule is pretty weak for National Championship consideration, IMO.
I'd say they shouldn't be in it simply for playing Kent State in the middle of the season, then again, just about every Big 12 South team has their own Kent State on the schedule in the form of Baylor.
who said never...don't assume sami.
1. t.u. needs bashing
2. i noticed
3. hard to say, we have better athletes now vs. 5 years ago, but our teams haven't been as good...so with a new coach its tough to say
4. i wanted mike sherman last year, ask j-6, so i am happy right now
5. actually as of 2005, not sure right now (other than A&M has 32 current players), A&M had more players in the NFL than any other big 12 school. this whole talent disparity thing is myth. t.u. has had a little better talent, A&M has been completely mismanaged
...i would imagine A&M still leads the big 12 in NFL players, 2 years later.
anyway....back to the game. starts in about an hour, and i am excited to watch it. the Pac-10 vs. the Big 12...of course i am going for the Pac-10 against anyone not named Texas A&M, let alone t.u.. but i do think it has the makings of a classic, should be a very close game.
ASU 34
t.u. 31
....go sun devils.
Kirk is right, that play just saved the game for the sun devils....holy . but t.u. is playing great right now, absolutely killing the sun devils.
...truth be told, i thought t.u. would win this game by a touchdown, but i am of course going for ASU which factored into my prediction.
crazy...
this ing neocon's blunder is just the type of event to completely shift the momentum of a college football game.
This does not look good.
Obviously wonder did not watch the 5 plays after that one which indicated a total bloatation of momentum
plus if you remember
ive been convinced this season is cursed
and we lost to two of the tiest big twelve teams around two seasons in a row
so HNaturally i'm pessimistic
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)