in the Republican portion, I thought Romney had the best ideas and came across as a real candidate of change. Guilliani is a more electable version of Romney.
Yea, guess you haven't checked out Ron Paul's stances on the subject yet. No Amnesty, No birthright citizenship, secure the border. No more en lements.
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/bo...ration-reform/
in the Republican portion, I thought Romney had the best ideas and came across as a real candidate of change. Guilliani is a more electable version of Romney.
Who won the facebook poll for each party after the debates?
I thought the turning point was after Hillary was attacking Obama about him flip-flopping on issues such as the Patriotism act, and when she stated what Obama said about Edwards being unelectable. IMO I don't think that she was thinking that by her defending Edwards he would come right back and say what he said about her because she wasn't leading in the polls anymore. That is the moment right there when I saw she got pissed. But I'll agree Obama was pretty quiet during the Edwards, Hillary debates. He should have jumped on that. Bill Richardson was pretty much calling himself playing peace keeper the entire debate. But thats what it is a debate on the issues. He kept pissing me off with that whole non-argument stuff. He made valid points when he wasn't trying to draw laughs from the audience.
Ghouliani is NOT electable. We the People have had 7 years of non-stop Repug fear-mongering and RG has nothing to offer but more fear-mongering and sordid persona life and abuse of NYC govt, plus lies about him personally driving down the NYC crime rater when the decline started 3 years before he took office. Totally unelectable.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)