Time to help Ghost out. Perhaps Kidd isn't as good today as you recall him being 7 years ago.
this is the dumbest thread I have ever read in my life....i think this trade would make the Gasol trade look good for Memphis. Mike Miller would be the only player that they should trade for, IF they had to make a trade right now....which they don't. we just punked 6 of 9 teams on the road trip and realistically, we should have won all 9 games...WITHOUT Parker. Thank god none of you guys are GM's.
Only if you are dumb enough to not understand the purpose of this thread.
This thread sucked in 2004.
Apparently it's contagious.
Exactly.
We're winning without Parker.
Now add Kidd for 2 consecutive playoffs and the ability to sign a max contract as early as the summer of 2009.
Eh, only the No Limit Army understands your battle tactics.
Except when we lost to Seattle without Parker.
Winning in February against Eastern Conference teams. Did the Spurs beat the C's without Parker?
So what? The Spurs get an older slower past his prime player and then they have to hope they can land a max free agent level talent.Now add Kidd for 2 consecutive playoffs and the ability to sign a max contract as early as the summer of 2009.
correction: "we are BARELY winning regular season games without Parker with Duncan + Manu playing 40 minutes"
Hopefully, we won't face SEA in the playoffs. Weak take, base. That was right after Parker went down. We got another PG since then.
P.S.
Jason Kidd
Second player in NBA history to average a triple-double for an entire postseason. Kidd finished with averages of 14.6 points, 10.9 rebounds and 10.9 assists in 12 games during the 2007 NBA playoffs.
Joined Oscar Robertson who averaged 28.8 points, 11.0 assists and 11.0 rebounds in 4 games in a 3-1 first-round loss in 1962.
Jason Kidd is the first person in 10 years to obtain a triple-double for 3 games in a row with 13 points, 12 assists, and 11 rebounds (1/08/2008).
Yeah, he's done.
We'd beat them with Kidd.
You really have no faith in the front office, huh?
Counting on another #1?
Has Ghost ever really meant anything he's argued, or is he the greatest troll of all time?
Question.
And they didnt beat the Celtics. They only beat the Raptors and Cavs due to Ginobili playing out of his mind, but, I know, he sucks too.
And his team went home without a le. That's 36 year old Jason Kidd.P.S.
Jason Kidd
Second player in NBA history to average a triple-double for an entire postseason. Kidd finished with averages of 14.6 points, 10.9 rebounds and 10.9 assists in 12 games during the 2007 NBA playoffs.
Unknown. And that was a Celtics team without Garnett.
That's the same front office that drafted Parker and Ginobili.You really have no faith in the front office, huh?
Counting on another #1?
Anyways, if you think they should be able to land these max free agents yet somehow are incapable of using the magic 'signing free agent' potion why do you continue to be a fan? It's not going to change. The Spurs will always struggle to land young max level talent to come to small market San Antonio. They've found other means to put together one of the best trios in the NBA. Why must one of those players have been traded for or signed from another team as a max free agent?
Your point has to be the most re ed in ST.com history.
He means it. A Connecticut psychiatrist has a long-term lucrative client.
You are sucking all over the place in this thread.
You said Kidd is done and I hit you back with phenomenal stats from 2007-08.
You cry that the Spurs could not beat the Celts w/o Parker and I point out they might with Kidd.
The team is rolling without Parker and you are afraid to add Kidd as his replacement.
You have no faith in your front office, yet are afraid to trade for an All-Star.
TKO.
Checkmate.
You said the Spurs' biggest problems are scoring at the small forward position, weakness in the 4/5 rotation, and the overall age of the team. So naturally trading their 25 year old rising star point guard for a 36 year old makes sense to you.
People are laughing at your ass. Hard.
The Spurs lost to Seattle, a team that had lost 14 in a row and then they lost to a Celtics team without Kevin Garnett. It took two superhuman performances by Emmanuel Ginobili to beat the Raptors and Cavs. That's hardly "rolling".The team is rolling without Parker and you are afraid to add Kidd as his replacement.
I have faith that the front office will be able to continue to use draft picks and shrewd free agent pickups to build a supporting cast around their big 3, 2 of whom are home grown.You have no faith in your front office, yet are afraid to trade for an All-Star.
You put up stats from Kidd in an entirely different offense, in a weaker conference, and of a player who is likely 2 years from retirement. You bemoan the ineptness of the Spurs' front office yet are ready to run out their top young player and count on their newfound ability to lure a top young free agent to play in small market sleepy San Antonio in the shadow of Tim Duncan and Manu Ginobili.
You've been hit so hard you don't know what's up and what's down. You are a novice when it comes to basketball, only relying on name brands that were on the top of the market 7 years ago. The internets have passed you by old man. It's time to hang up the modem.
Popd@mn.
You don't break up a core that brought you 3 championships in 5 years until it is obvous they are done winning.
Read and repeat.
Is there a simpler NBA axiom?
Was there a point in that emotional diatribe?
You just admitted that you'd rather Parker for the forseeable future rather than Kidd for the next two postseasons and the ability to go after a max free agent as early as 2009.
Well done.
I'd rather what? Don't get so choked up you can't express yourself clearly.
Read it again.
You'd rather Parker for the forseeable future, than Kidd for the next two postseasons and the ability to sign a max free agent as early as 2009.
That's a lot of faith in Parker and very little in your front office.
How soon should we tank a year and make it 3-for-3 in lottery drafts?
2010?
2011?
How much gas does Duncan have left?
Again, please confirm the following:
You'd rather Parker for the forseeable future, than Kidd for the next two postseasons and the ability to sign a max free agent as early as 2009.
If so, all I can do is sit back and applaud your convictions.
Well done.
Trading Parker for Kidd today would be the worst move in Spurs' history.
Why?
Because you are counting on lottery balls.
Again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
