Reply With Quote
What the are you talking about? The state of OHIO owns Michigan!
-TD
Do you know how to stay on topic?
We were talking about developing NFL quarterbacks.
Do you know how to engage in a real argument?
What the are you talking about? The state of OHIO owns Michigan!
-TD
I think it was you that swayed the whole topic of this discussion as to who can develop a better NFL QB (which really has nothing to do with Ohio State of Michigan)
Both teams are overrated and play in a weak conference. Sure you (tOSU) played in the national le game, but was it deserved?No Neither team should have played, thats why no one out side of Louisiana gives a about this last national championship. Can you honestly say osu was better the UG or USC last year? Michigan lost to a d-2 team AT HOME, but they did beat UF....Whoever signed Pryor is going to have an edge in the rivalry UNTIL rich rod gets his dual threat. I think tOSU ownage of Michigan will end soon..just not in the next two years.
Nope. I merely responded to this:
Do you have a scan of that do ent?
this is true. its a shame it wasn't USC and Georgia in the Rose Bowl...
I think losing to one of the worst programs in the last 10 years at home had alot to do with USC not playing in the MNC game...just a thought but if you want to play in a championship game you should be able to beat a team that averages 3 wins a year at home.
Lol, Who did tOSU beat? I'm not a USC fan, but they are due an upset or two during the season. However, last year they had a few injuries mid way through. You saw what USC can do when healthy. they dismantled a team *Illi* that beat tOSU in the horse shoe. That alone shows that tOSU should have not been playing in the national le, neither teams had any business playing that game.
big 10 is a joke these days.
Last edited by UT09; 03-19-2008 at 06:53 PM.
i love how people keep bringing up that stanford loss....who cares. they were still playing as well as anyone at the end of the year, they were still arguably the best team...and then they destroyed illinois. blow me with that stanford crap...teams will drop games they shouldn't sometimes, judge the season, not 1 crappy game.
So two seasons ago, judge the 2006 Wolverines by their season, not one crappy game against USC in the Rose Bowl?
Your logic.
ROFL
the ohio state university is like one of the biggest abortions of a school of all time
no, not really. yes, michigan had a good year, but they beat up on the weak big 10. furthermore, i am referring to losing to a crappy team in a shocker...SC obviously overlooked stanford...michigan didn't overlook SC. SC just bulldozed them.
so, basically i am saying shocking losses mean less than big/huge wins...thats my opinion. another way to look at it, is if stanford played SC again, what would happen? if michigan played SC again, what would happen? i think only the stanford score would be significantly different. you don't have to agree, but thats how i tend to look at those types of CFB scores...makes sense to me.
ok then forget Ohio St. losing to LSU and using your stupid logic to put USC in the MNC game
big ten crappy or not, Ohio State could take care of Stanford at home
After WVU's pasting of Oklahoma, I would have much rather have seen a Sugar Bowl rematch (WVU vs. Georgia) or WVU vs. USC.
I think if Michigan and USC played 10 times that year, USC wins 6 or 7 times. Michigan wins 3 or 4 times. Depending how they came out, I absolutely think Michigan could have beat USC. USC was great. I think Michigan was disappointed they weren't in the NC game. It's not an excuse, but I think that's what happened. So, yeah, by your logic, I think Michigan could have beat USC if they played again.
Further, if Michigan and Ohio State played 10 times that year, I think Michigan and Ohio State split 5-5. So, if we played that game over, I think Michigan wins and Michigan doesn't even play USC in the Rose Bowl.
A lot of hypotheticals and conjecture in your logic.
A loss is a loss. And, a loss to a crappy Standford team is not justifiable, no matter who was injured, no matter what the cir stances. Michigan doesn't get any pass for losing to App. St. It goes down as a monumental upset, not a shocker. USC is lucky Oregon had problems too, because with that Stanford loss, USC didn't even deserve to be in the Rose Bowl last year.
This thread has more tangents than an episode of Family Guy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
