First of all ill argue the point about team record (ill move on to stats later because Pierce has a case)
Pierce is definately on an All NBA team... his team has been so dominant and he has put up solid numbers and has been the closer in close games in the 4th. He kept the team at 7-2 when KG went out and a team so dominant has to have more than one guy on the All NBA teams.
Carmelo has also been only the second best player on his team. Along with having the likely Defensive Player of the Year and are nearly 15 games worse than the Celtics (albeit with a tougher schedule).
On to numbers.... i dont like getting to technical because voters i dont think, generally even look at these sorts of things. But the Nuggets play at the fastest pace in the league, while the Celtics play at the slowest.
I dont think anyone has any idea of how hard it is to put up dominant 25-6-6 stats for example playing at as slow a pace as the Celts do. Less rebounds less scoring opportunities, basically less opportunities for every statistical category. Carmelo has also played more minutes
When you adjust for all this then Paul Pierce probably has been more dominant statistically then Carmelo ... and this isnt even taking team record into consideration obviously.
Firstly ill say that PER is not the be-all-end-all of a players statistical output , there are other factors but it is the only measurement that wont penalise guys like Garnett and Duncan whos teams play at snail pace against teams putting up stats like Phoenix and Denver because there teams take 20 extra shots per game.
Basically Pierce has a higher PER than Carmelo which is an adjusted measure based purely on statistics... and Pierce has Melo done here.
And we all know how voters like winning.
A question for you....
What sort of stats do you think Melo and PP put up if they swap places???